From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] remove spi-s3c24xx-gpio driver Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:51:34 -0600 Message-ID: <20110704165134.GF28042@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1309265357-15879-1-git-send-email-jacmet@sunsite.dk> <20110628212443.GI21138@trinity.fluff.org> <87ipro4loa.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <87ei2c4jch.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, ben-linux@fluff.org, Ben Dooks To: Peter Korsgaard Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ei2c4jch.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:51:10PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>>>> "Grant" == Grant Likely writes: > > >> Great, will you handle the series or should it go through the spi tree? > > Grant> With the big spi driver rename, it should probably either go via the > Grant> spi tree, or be put into a topic branch that can be merged by both the > Grant> spi and samsung trees. > > Both is fine by me. Let me know if you want me to do something. It's pretty minimal arch/arm impact, and it depends on the big rename patch, so why don't I just merge it directly into spi/next without a topic branch. g. > > -- > Bye, Peter Korsgaard