From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:43:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20120402104357.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1333306720-28344-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120402101427.GA3172@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Walleij , Rabin Vincent , Grant Likely , Samuel Ortiz , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120402101427.GA3172@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:14:28AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:39:11AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > Mark: as Rabin says the v1 patch is probably fine, are you pushing this > > to ARM SoC or into Russell's patch tracker? > > I was waiting for some pronouncement from Russell - looking at the git > logs it seems the patch tracker is the normal way to merge things. Well, this stuff was invented by Linus, so its Linus' decision about how to deal with the power control.