From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:31:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20120410083130.GK24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1333306720-28344-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120406074942.GO7264@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Linus Walleij , Mark Brown , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Shawn Guo Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120406074942.GO7264-rvtDTF3kK1ictlrPMvKcciBecyulp+rMXqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 03:49:45PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > I believe this patch fixes the amba probe failure that impacts any > AMBA platform build with CONFIG_REGULATOR enabled. Could you consider > to send the fix for -rc soon? No idea. I don't have Mark's patch in the patch system. > The patch "ARM: amba: adapt to regulator probe deferral change" from > me could be ignored now. But I do have yours in there. And what do I do with your other patch in there touching this same area as well? Please, sort it out between you and once the patch system is right, let me know. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev