From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: mc13xxx: add I2C support, V5 Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 12:39:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20120501103949.GC20224@sortiz-mobl> References: <1333262499-25871-1-git-send-email-marc@cpdesign.com.au> <201204170921.42027.marc@cpdesign.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Marc Reilly Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201204170921.42027.marc-DtE7ei5U7Kg0n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:21:41AM +1000, Marc Reilly wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > > On Sunday, April 01, 2012 04:41:35 PM Marc Reilly wrote: > > This series (against mfd-2.6/for-next) changes the mc13xxx driver to use > > regmap and adds I2C support. > > It has a compile dependency on regmap/for-next, as the spi driver uses the > > recently added pad_bits config field. > > (bump). > > Are these changes OK to go in? All 4 patches applied to my for-next branch. I had to manually apply patch #1, please verify that it's all good. I added an Acked-by: Oskar Schirmer to patch #4. Please make sure that you add the right tags to the corresponding patches in the future. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/