From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10 V2] spi: Add SPI driver for mx233/mx28 Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 18:03:25 +0200 Message-ID: <201208021803.25460.marex@denx.de> References: <1343076052-27312-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201208021658.38237.marex@denx.de> <20120802160016.GA4537@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fabio Estevam , Shawn Guo , Attila Kinali , spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Chris Ball , Dong Aisheng , Linux ARM kernel To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120802160016.GA4537-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Dear Mark Brown, > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:58:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > It'd be nice to only keep the clocks enabled while doing transfers but > > > again totally non-essential. > > > > Hm, this is spread across mxs. Shawn, is there any plan for PM > > implementation for MXS ? > > Take a look at s3c64xx - I did something with runtime PM for this, it's > something that can reasonably be implemented in drivers and as far as I > can tell most framework implementations end up using runtime PM anyway. We don't even support runtime pm on mxs yet IIRC Best regards, Marek Vasut ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/