From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/mxs: Fix device remove function Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 07:46:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20120825144616.GA6520@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1345831382-7290-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <201208242210.12924.marex@denx.de> <20120824203739.GA7592@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marek Vasut , spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Guenter Roeck Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120824203739.GA7592-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:37:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > For some reason most spi drivers have similar problems. I learned it > the hard way when I tested my own driver, and decided to fix as many > drivers as I can. Which is why you see all those patches from me > lately. It's not exactly the most obvious API, nor is it a particularly common pattern for drivers, so it's hardly surprising that it's error prone. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/