From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] mxs/spi: Add SPI slave mode operation DT prop Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:39:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20120827163930.GG4339@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1345776161-9778-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fabio Estevam , spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Chris Ball , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Shawn Guo To: Marek Vasut Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1345776161-9778-1-git-send-email-marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:42:41AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > This allows user to select the slave mode of operation of the controller. > This is by no means standard, see the binding documentation for details, > there is plenty of them. Sadly, such knowledge is not provided in the chip > documentation. Hopefully, this mode of operation might come useful for > people who do know very well what they are doing, otherwise this should > never be touched. I was going to touch this but I appear to have misplaced my bargepole :) More seriously as you say this is a bit controversial so given that Grant's now finished his move and should reappear soon I'll punt for now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/