From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: remove completely broken Tegra driver Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:20:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20121001102055.GD4360@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1348848948-21795-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <50696555.1050509@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephen Warren , Grant Likely , "spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Stephen Warren To: Laxman Dewangan Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50696555.1050509-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:11:41PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > It will be great if this goes in k3.7 so that we can post the new > driver on K3.8. Why would this make any difference to the ability to post a new version? I do wish stop making up version numbers, it's very irritating. I suppose at least people are now including the actual number rather than the "K32" stuff we used to get :/ > Definitely it will easy to review along with multiple bug fixes > which is done in driver for interfacing different devices like > camera/ touch etc. > Having all these changes on top of existing one will create more > than 10 patches and complicate the review. Also after these many > patches, the new driver will be look different than the existing > one. You can always just post the removal as the first patch in the series...