From: Mark Brown <broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org,
rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: add spi driver for SLINK controller
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:28:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121022122825.GD4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350557233-31234-1-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2696 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 04:17:13PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> + udelay(1);
> + wmb();
> + }
> + tspi->dma_control_reg = val;
> + val |= SLINK_DMA_EN;
> + tegra_slink_writel(tspi, val, SLINK_DMA_CTL);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static int tegra_slink_init_dma_param(struct tegra_slink_data *tspi,
> + bool dma_to_memory)
> +{
Blank line between functions.
> + tegra_slink_clk_disable(tspi);
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(tspi->dev);
> + return 0;
Throughout the code you're using pm_runtime_put_sync() - why does this
need to be _sync()? Can't we just use a regular put()? If we can't we
should document why.
> +static int tegra_slink_prepare_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
> +{
> + struct tegra_slink_data *tspi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(tspi->dev);
> + return 0;
Should really check the error code of the pm_runtime call here.
> +static struct tegra_spi_platform_data *tegra_slink_parese_dt(
> + struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
There doens't seem to be any binding documentation; binding
documentation is mandatory.
> + prop = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "spi_max_frequency", NULL);
> + if (prop)
> + pdata->spi_max_frequency = be32_to_cpup(prop);
> + else
> + pdata->spi_max_frequency = 25000000; /* 25MHz */
Why is the default not being picked in the general non-OF case?
> +const struct tegra_slink_chip_data tegra30_spi_cdata = {
> + .cs_hold_time = true,
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +const struct tegra_slink_chip_data tegra20_spi_cdata = {
> + .cs_hold_time = false,
> +};
> +
> +static struct of_device_id tegra_slink_of_match[] __devinitconst = {
> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-slink", .data = &tegra20_spi_cdata, },
> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-slink", .data = &tegra30_spi_cdata, },
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_slink_of_match);
> +#endif
The ifdefs here look misplaced?
> + spi_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (unlikely(spi_irq < 0)) {
Putting optimisation hints like unlikely() here is pointless.
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, tspi->irq,
> + tegra_slink_isr, tegra_slink_isr_thread, IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), tspi);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register ISR for IRQ %d\n",
> + tspi->irq);
> + goto exit_free_master;
> + }
Any use of devm_ IRQ functions is suspicous... why is this safe against
an interrupt firing after the SPI device has started to deallocate?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int tegra_slink_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + spi_master_suspend(master);
> + return 0;
Should use the return code of spi_master_suspend().
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-22 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 10:47 [PATCH] spi: tegra: add spi driver for SLINK controller Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <1350557233-31234-1-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-22 12:28 ` Mark Brown [this message]
[not found] ` <20121022122825.GD4477-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-22 18:04 ` Thierry Reding
2012-10-22 20:02 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <5085A667.2000100-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-23 9:17 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-26 18:49 ` Laxman Dewangan
[not found] ` <508ADB1C.6040602-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-29 15:17 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <508E9E22.6030201-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-29 16:18 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-29 18:55 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121022122825.GD4477@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie-yzvpicuk2aatku/dhu1wvuem+bqzidxxqq4iyu8u01e@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).