From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Remove SPI_BUFSIZ restriction on spi_write_then_read() Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:04:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20121206140427.8E5673E089D@localhost> References: <1354420465-29315-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20121206000026.A620D3E0E22@localhost> <20121206053732.GD10867@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121206053732.GD10867-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:37:33 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:00:26AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > > > Looks good to me. Probably 3.9 material though. > > > Acked-by: Grant Likely > > Hrm, I'd be inclined to apply it now - it's isolated enough that it can > be reverted if it explodes and we have the -rc cycle to notice any > problems. Alright, applied. I've also merged in your spi-next tree. Let me know if that causes problems because it needs to be rebased. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d