* [PATCH] spi: erase pointer to drvdata on removal
@ 2012-11-01 18:05 Vivien Didelot
[not found] ` <1351793136-14126-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot-4ysUXcep3aM1wj+D4I0NRVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vivien Didelot @ 2012-11-01 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: spi-devel-general; +Cc: Vivien Didelot, Grant Likely, linux-kernel
As for i2c-core, let the SPI core handle the removal of the device's
drvdata, after a remove() or a probe() failure.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 84c2861..fe636fe 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -233,15 +233,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_bus_type);
static int spi_drv_probe(struct device *dev)
{
const struct spi_driver *sdrv = to_spi_driver(dev->driver);
+ struct spi_device *sdev = to_spi_device(dev);
+ int status;
- return sdrv->probe(to_spi_device(dev));
+ status = sdrv->probe(sdev);
+ if (status)
+ spi_set_drvdata(sdev, NULL);
+ return status;
}
static int spi_drv_remove(struct device *dev)
{
const struct spi_driver *sdrv = to_spi_driver(dev->driver);
+ struct spi_device *sdev = to_spi_device(dev);
+ int status;
- return sdrv->remove(to_spi_device(dev));
+ status = sdrv->remove(sdev);
+ if (status == 0)
+ spi_set_drvdata(sdev, NULL);
+ return status;
}
static void spi_drv_shutdown(struct device *dev)
--
1.7.11.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1351793136-14126-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot-4ysUXcep3aM1wj+D4I0NRVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] spi: erase pointer to drvdata on removal [not found] ` <1351793136-14126-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot-4ysUXcep3aM1wj+D4I0NRVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> @ 2013-01-14 2:51 ` Mark Brown 2013-01-14 20:11 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2013-01-14 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vivien Didelot Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:05:36PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > As for i2c-core, let the SPI core handle the removal of the device's > drvdata, after a remove() or a probe() failure. Any driver that notices this change is buggy, the driver shouldn't use a drvdata value that it didn't set. I had thought this stuff had all been removed from I2C and either dropped or factored out into the driver core... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: erase pointer to drvdata on removal 2013-01-14 2:51 ` Mark Brown @ 2013-01-14 20:11 ` Grant Likely 2013-01-14 21:24 ` Vivien Didelot 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2013-01-14 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown, Vivien Didelot; +Cc: spi-devel-general, linux-kernel On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 02:51:45 +0000, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:05:36PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > > As for i2c-core, let the SPI core handle the removal of the device's > > drvdata, after a remove() or a probe() failure. > > Any driver that notices this change is buggy, the driver shouldn't > use a drvdata value that it didn't set. I had thought this stuff had > all been removed from I2C and either dropped or factored out into the > driver core... Looks to me like __device_release_driver() in drivers/base/dd.c already does this. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] spi: erase pointer to drvdata on removal 2013-01-14 20:11 ` Grant Likely @ 2013-01-14 21:24 ` Vivien Didelot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Vivien Didelot @ 2013-01-14 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Likely; +Cc: spi-devel-general, linux-kernel, Mark Brown Hi Mark, Grant, > On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 02:51:45 +0000, Mark Brown > <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:05:36PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > > > As for i2c-core, let the SPI core handle the removal of the > > > device's > > > drvdata, after a remove() or a probe() failure. > > > > Any driver that notices this change is buggy, the driver shouldn't > > use a drvdata value that it didn't set. I had thought this stuff > > had > > all been removed from I2C and either dropped or factored out into > > the > > driver core... > > Looks to me like __device_release_driver() in drivers/base/dd.c > already > does this. > > g. You are right, I figured this out after the resend of this patch, see my reply here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/4/224 -Vivien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-14 21:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-01 18:05 [PATCH] spi: erase pointer to drvdata on removal Vivien Didelot
[not found] ` <1351793136-14126-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot-4ysUXcep3aM1wj+D4I0NRVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-14 2:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-14 20:11 ` Grant Likely
2013-01-14 21:24 ` Vivien Didelot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).