From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] spi/bcm63xx: fix multi transfer messages Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:14:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20130205171408.3C60F3E1427@localhost> References: <1359900913-4472-1-git-send-email-jogo@openwrt.org> <20130205143040.208603E1265@localhost> <20130205150441.GC4720@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Jonas Gorski , Kevin Cernekee , Florian Fainelli , Maxime Bizon To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130205150441.GC4720-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:04:41 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:30:40PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > > > Another option is to allow longer transfers if a GPIO is used for the CS > > line. A lot of SPI controllers need to do that. > > > That isn't a critique of this patch because it is essentially a bug fix, > > but rather a way you can work around the limitation. > > Yeah, I did suggest that to them originally but apparently the hardware > is sufficient fail that the pins can't be put into GPIO mode for the > affected boards. Hahaha. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb