From: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam
<fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] spi/mxs: Fix chip select control bits in DMA mode
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:13:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304020113.42124.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364570381-17605-2-git-send-email-tpiepho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Dear Trent Piepho,
> In DMA mode the chip select control bits would be ORed into the CTRL0
> register without first clearing the bits. This means that after
> addressing slave 1 the bit would be still be set when addressing slave
> 0, resulting in slave 1 continuing to be addressed.
>
> The message handing function would pass the cs value to the txrx
> function, which would re-program the bits on each transfer in the
> message. The selected cs does not change during a message so this is
> inefficient. It also means there are two different sets of code for
> selecting the CS, one for PIO that worked and one for DMA that didn't.
>
> Change the code to set the CS bits in the message transfer function
> once. Now the DMA and PIO txrx functions don't need to care about CS
> at all.
Ok, lemme ask this one more time -- will the DMA work with long transfers where
the CTRL0 will be overwritten on each turn? Did you actually test this?
> Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c | 40 +++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c
> index aa77d96b9..5d63b21 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mxs.c
> @@ -130,9 +130,9 @@ static int mxs_spi_setup(struct spi_device *dev)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static uint32_t mxs_spi_cs_to_reg(unsigned cs)
> +static u32 mxs_spi_cs_to_reg(unsigned cs)
> {
> - uint32_t select = 0;
> + u32 select = 0;
This change is unneeded, remove it.
> /*
> * i.MX28 Datasheet: 17.10.1: HW_SSP_CTRL0
> @@ -150,18 +150,6 @@ static uint32_t mxs_spi_cs_to_reg(unsigned cs)
> return select;
> }
>
> -static void mxs_spi_set_cs(struct mxs_spi *spi, unsigned cs)
> -{
> - const uint32_t mask =
> - BM_SSP_CTRL0_WAIT_FOR_CMD | BM_SSP_CTRL0_WAIT_FOR_IRQ;
> - uint32_t select;
> - struct mxs_ssp *ssp = &spi->ssp;
> -
> - writel(mask, ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> - select = mxs_spi_cs_to_reg(cs);
> - writel(select, ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> -}
> -
> static int mxs_ssp_wait(struct mxs_spi *spi, int offset, int mask, bool
> set) {
> const unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(SSP_TIMEOUT);
> @@ -199,7 +187,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mxs_ssp_irq_handler(int irq, void
> *dev_id) return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static int mxs_spi_txrx_dma(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs,
> +static int mxs_spi_txrx_dma(struct mxs_spi *spi,
> unsigned char *buf, int len,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> @@ -227,10 +215,11 @@ static int mxs_spi_txrx_dma(struct mxs_spi *spi, int
> cs,
>
> INIT_COMPLETION(spi->c);
>
> + /* Chip select was already programmed into CTRL0 */
> ctrl0 = readl(ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0);
> ctrl0 &= ~BM_SSP_CTRL0_XFER_COUNT & ~BM_SSP_CTRL0_IGNORE_CRC &
> ~BM_SSP_CTRL0_READ;
> - ctrl0 |= BM_SSP_CTRL0_DATA_XFER | mxs_spi_cs_to_reg(cs);
> + ctrl0 |= BM_SSP_CTRL0_DATA_XFER;
>
> if (!(flags & TXRX_WRITE))
> ctrl0 |= BM_SSP_CTRL0_READ;
> @@ -332,7 +321,7 @@ err_mapped:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int mxs_spi_txrx_pio(struct mxs_spi *spi, int cs,
> +static int mxs_spi_txrx_pio(struct mxs_spi *spi,
> unsigned char *buf, int len,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> @@ -342,8 +331,6 @@ static int mxs_spi_txrx_pio(struct mxs_spi *spi, int
> cs, writel(BM_SSP_CTRL0_IGNORE_CRC,
> ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
>
> - mxs_spi_set_cs(spi, cs);
> -
> while (len--) {
> if (len == 0 && (flags & TXRX_DEASSERT_CS))
> writel(BM_SSP_CTRL0_IGNORE_CRC,
> @@ -405,9 +392,12 @@ static int mxs_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master
> *master, struct spi_transfer *t, *tmp_t;
> unsigned int flag;
> int status = 0;
> - int cs;
>
> - cs = m->spi->chip_select;
> + /* Program CS register bits here, it will be used for all transfers. */
> + writel(BM_SSP_CTRL0_WAIT_FOR_CMD | BM_SSP_CTRL0_WAIT_FOR_IRQ,
> + ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> + writel(mxs_spi_cs_to_reg(m->spi->chip_select),
> + ssp->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(t, tmp_t, &m->transfers, transfer_list) {
>
> @@ -440,11 +430,11 @@ static int mxs_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master
> *master, STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
>
> if (t->tx_buf)
> - status = mxs_spi_txrx_pio(spi, cs,
> + status = mxs_spi_txrx_pio(spi,
> (void *)t->tx_buf,
> t->len, flag | TXRX_WRITE);
> if (t->rx_buf)
> - status = mxs_spi_txrx_pio(spi, cs,
> + status = mxs_spi_txrx_pio(spi,
> t->rx_buf, t->len,
> flag);
> } else {
> @@ -453,11 +443,11 @@ static int mxs_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master
> *master, STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
>
> if (t->tx_buf)
> - status = mxs_spi_txrx_dma(spi, cs,
> + status = mxs_spi_txrx_dma(spi,
> (void *)t->tx_buf, t->len,
> flag | TXRX_WRITE);
> if (t->rx_buf)
> - status = mxs_spi_txrx_dma(spi, cs,
> + status = mxs_spi_txrx_dma(spi,
> t->rx_buf, t->len,
> flag);
> }
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-01 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-29 15:19 [PATCH 1/5] spi/mxs: Fix extra CS pulses and read mode in multi-transfer messages Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <1364570381-17605-1-git-send-email-tpiepho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-29 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] spi/mxs: Fix chip select control bits in DMA mode Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <1364570381-17605-2-git-send-email-tpiepho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 23:13 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
[not found] ` <201304020113.42124.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 23:27 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <CA+7tXih2wAVeLpVoYkt4Tmo3h0YtLoZY3vCcv5s8sUD1u8_BVQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 23:30 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201304020130.51951.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 23:40 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <CA+7tXij_V1iAdPuPoTQ6CK6U5Y-iJprCPsTj=_LHAV1-=CL7gA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 0:02 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201304020202.43501.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 1:58 ` Trent Piepho
2013-03-29 15:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] spi/mxs: Remove full duplex check, spi core already does it Trent Piepho
2013-03-29 15:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] spi/mxs: Remove bogus setting of ssp clk rate field Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <1364570381-17605-4-git-send-email-tpiepho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 23:16 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201304020116.04781.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 23:32 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <CA+7tXihhL2ETT+AgvX5KASZOOgi6bucModE88ztY9Q8U1gDbOQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 23:37 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-02 0:07 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <CA+7tXihfDnmkTJGzk_yvRKYwb5mJzzLJVV+XupCEGnmpQdKDLQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 0:29 ` Marek Vasut
2013-03-29 15:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] spi/mxs: Fix multiple slave bug and don't set clock for each xfer Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <1364570381-17605-5-git-send-email-tpiepho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 23:18 ` Marek Vasut
2013-04-01 23:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] spi/mxs: Fix extra CS pulses and read mode in multi-transfer messages Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201304020111.13969.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 1:24 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <CA+7tXigx=qcDDJZGAx7JEX+Y-CDG-B0xyYgs6fHbUZofH7gnKw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 4:22 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201304020622.52429.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 7:11 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <CA+7tXigvg+5k0Baa12CVwP5Ar7HUsJ8ihB19xrav4CNA6ZMFiA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 10:32 ` Marek Vasut
[not found] ` <201304021232.12736.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 12:40 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <CA+7tXii8xhZQeKU2dTN26LxySNXhJT9NgRXcJ21cOX64qYj1NA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-02 23:39 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304020113.42124.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex-ynqeqjnshbs@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tpiepho-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).