linux-spi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
	<spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	<grant.likely@linaro.org>, <rnayak@ti.com>,
	<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 1/2] drivers: spi: Add qspi flash controller
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:55:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819185501.GL26587@radagast> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521244DC.9080600@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 706 bytes --]

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:46:28PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> >>+	} else if (wlen == 32) {
> >if else if else if else if .... this looks like a switch to me. I know
> >someone else commented that switch wasn't the best construct, but to my
> >eyes, switch looks a lot cleaner.
> >
> My previous switch implementation was implemented as a seperate
> function, as a result of which there was the need to pass pointers, other
> variables, then collect it as a double pointer, making things a bit untidy.
> 
> What I can do is to convert these portion into switch here itself,
> which will
> make the code a lot more cleaner. ?

perhaps, at least to me it looks cleaner.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-19 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-04  8:58 [PATCHv9 0/2] Add ti qspi controller Sourav Poddar
     [not found] ` <1375606690-834-1-git-send-email-sourav.poddar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-04  8:58   ` [PATCHv9 1/2] drivers: spi: Add qspi flash controller Sourav Poddar
2013-08-06 14:05     ` Sourav Poddar
2013-08-13 15:26     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-08-19 16:16       ` Sourav Poddar
2013-08-19 18:55         ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2013-08-04  8:58 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] driver: spi: Add quad spi read support Sourav Poddar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130819185501.GL26587@radagast \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).