From: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Linus Torvalds
<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] spi fixes for v3.15
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:47:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140411214704.GH28800@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxCubywWSLdhAva9dvj26=o4WkaVnhYjgEKrEuMuaFo+g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1987 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:41:56PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Same issue as on the regulator pull request with the entire diffstat for
> > the original pull request for this merge window has appeared - like I
> > say I will try to fix the scripts as it's annoying and unclear.
> Yeah, looking at this, the problem does seem to be that extraneous
> merge. I'm not sure why you did that "Merge tag 'spi-v3.15' into
> spi-linus" at all, but it basically acts as an indirect back-merge
> giving you two different merge bases.
Indeed.
> You seem to start your development by doing a merge of that tag that
> you sent me. Why? Why not just start *at* the tag you sent me, not at
> that extraneous merge of that tag and v3.14.
What the script is doing is starting from your latest tag, merging any
tags I've sent you in the meantime and then merging any additional topic
branches. I'm not doing any actual development on the resulting branch,
only on topic branches. The tags get merged first to suppress repeated
merges of the same topic branch if I've sent a prior pull request been
tagged yet and I use your latest tag to pick up fixes from other trees
and make sure I'm not tripping over things I sent you before.
Usually this works fine since most of the time either your latest tag
contains the last thing I sent you or my tag contains your most recent
tag and either way there's no back merge. What's gone wrong this time
around is that I sent you my initial pull requests based off the last
-rc rather than off the release tag, the script didn't cope well with
that and picked the wrong thing to base the merge off.
If I'd respun the merge before I sent the pull requests it'd all be
working as expected, I need to either just do that or teach the script
to be more sensible about picking where it starts building the merge
from.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-11 10:56 [GIT PULL] spi fixes for v3.15 Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20140411105604.GR6518-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-11 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxCubywWSLdhAva9dvj26=o4WkaVnhYjgEKrEuMuaFo+g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-11 21:47 ` Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-14 16:08 [GIT PULL] SPI " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140411214704.GH28800@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).