From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence: Add dependency on ARCH_ZYNQ Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:26:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20140415162621.GO17408@arm.com> References: <1397537392-3709-1-git-send-email-harinik@xilinx.com> <20140415094541.GL12304@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michal Simek , Harini Katakam , "linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , LKML , Michal Simek To: Mark Brown Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140415094541.GL12304-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:45:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:11:37AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > > > I sent the patch for it which solve this problem in generic way. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/8/42 > > > Feel free to give me ACK for it. > > Will has been working on this too off and on, he was also trying to > define some semantics for the relaxed versions. It'd be really good to > address this properly, this is a constant source of make work. Yes, I have a series adding relaxed accessors to all architectures (and asm-generic) along with an attempt at defining some semantics. This came about from discussion with BenH at the last kernel summit, I just didn't get around to posting what we came up with. I should be able to post something this week, but there's still an open question relating to mmiowb() that I'd like the PPC guys to chime in on. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html