From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example. Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:27:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20150512142759.GK10961@lukather> References: <20150426103257.GJ22845@sirena.org.uk> <20150426110144.GK22845@sirena.org.uk> <553CCABA.3090504@redhat.com> <12F80B18-7418-430E-94F7-5A20C133BA9A@martin.sperl.org> <20150426125113.GF5627@lukather> <20150427101601.GN22845@sirena.org.uk> <20150427173036.GA10950@lukather> <20150427180728.GW22845@sirena.org.uk> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yr6OvWOSyJed8q4v" Cc: Michal Suchanek , Martin Sperl , Hans de Goede , linux-sunxi , Jonathan Corbet , linux-spi , linux-doc , Linux Kernel Mailing List To: Mark Brown Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150427180728.GW22845-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org --yr6OvWOSyJed8q4v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:07:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > lkml.org is being terrible as usual so I can't see half the thread (or > > > at least got fed up trying to get it to load) > > > A part of it is also here: > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1405.0/00484.html > > OK, thanks. > > > > but I think the discussion there petered out more than anything > > > else. > > > Maybe it did :) > > I think so looking at the archives. > > > > Or was it the suggestion to make this something that the driver core > > > supported so that we didn't have to open code it for every bus? > > > Probably. That's something I really haven't took the time to look at, > > and don't really plan on doing so. > > > I guess a good way forward would be to revive this patch, and wait for > > that generic way to happen. > > > What do you think of this? > > Probably best, the Pi bootloader does make it a bit more important. > Might also be worth speaking to Greg though. So, do you want me to resend that patch and discuss this directly there (with Greg in Cc) ? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --yr6OvWOSyJed8q4v--