linux-spi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: Fix native cs with new set_cs
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 18:48:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150521234832.GA1827@deathray> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150521211638.GN21577@sirena.org.uk>

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:16:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:04:11PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> 
> > Do you want to revert the patch and apply a new one or should I provide a
> > patch that reverts the changes and fixes it all in one?
> 
> Can you please send me separate revert and re-add patches, that's
> probably going to be easier to review.

So after reverting this patch I found there is a issue in that it is difficult
to determine when a transfer is complete to properly drive the chipselect from
within the transfer_one function.

Then I figured that we could handle the case when GPIOs are being used with
some conditional calls to omap2_mcspi_set_cs in the omap2_mcspi_work_one
function.

Near the beginning of the function I added:
	if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
		omap2_mcspi_set_cs(spi, 0);

Near the end of the function I added:
	if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
		omap2_mcspi_set_cs(spi, 1);

This makes GPIO chip select support work while leaving the native working
as previous.

Is this solution acceptible?

In the process of reviewing the changes I found a few other things that
should be changed as well.

Here you will see a delay that is already handled by the core spi driver:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c#n1166

In the set_cs function the inversion of the enable that occurs in the
core spi_set_cs function based on SPI_CS_HIGH needs to revert as the
controller handles the inversion with OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_EPOL bit in the
CHCONF register.

If you approve of the fix for the GPIO support, I will provide a patch
series with all of these above mentioned fixes.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-21 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-12 17:38 [PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: Fix native cs with new set_cs Michael Welling
2015-05-12 18:57 ` Nishanth Menon
     [not found]   ` <55524D20.2050203-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-12 19:19     ` Mark Brown
2015-05-12 19:21       ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-12 19:17 ` Mark Brown
     [not found]   ` <20150512191758.GX3066-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-21  2:07     ` Michael Welling
2015-05-21 10:18       ` Mark Brown
2015-05-21 21:04         ` Michael Welling
2015-05-21 21:16           ` Mark Brown
2015-05-21 23:48             ` Michael Welling [this message]
2015-05-22 12:25               ` Mark Brown
2015-05-22 15:31                 ` Michael Welling
2015-05-24  2:13                 ` [PATCH 0/4] spi: omap2-mcspi: Fixes for recent updates Michael Welling
2015-05-24  2:13                   ` [PATCH 1/4] spi: omap2-mcspi: Remove unnecessary delay Michael Welling
2015-05-24  2:13                   ` [PATCH 2/4] spi: omap2-mcspi: Fix set_cs function for active high Michael Welling
2015-05-24  2:13                   ` [PATCH 3/4] spi: omap2-mcspi: Fix GPIO chip select support Michael Welling
2015-05-24  2:13                   ` [PATCH 4/4] spi: omap2-mcspi: Handle error on gpio_request Michael Welling
2015-05-24  8:13                     ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-24 16:52                       ` Michael Welling
     [not found]                   ` <1432433625-23407-1-git-send-email-mwelling-EkmVulN54Sk@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-25 12:00                     ` [PATCH 0/4] spi: omap2-mcspi: Fixes for recent updates Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150521234832.GA1827@deathray \
    --to=mwelling@ieee.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).