* [RFC PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: disable other channels CHCONF_FORCE in prepare_message
@ 2015-10-08 14:45 Neil Armstrong
2015-10-08 15:21 ` Michael Welling
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neil Armstrong @ 2015-10-08 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, linux-spi, linux-kernel, Michael Welling,
Fionn Cleary, Wolfram Sang, Jarkko Nikula, Sebastian Reichel
Since the "Switch driver to use transfer_one" change, the cs_change
behavior has changed and a channel chip select can still be
asserted when changing channel from a previous last transfer in s
message having the cs_change attribute.
Since there is no sense having multiple chip select being asserted at the
same time, disable all the remaining forces chip selects in a the
prepare_message called right before a spi_transfer_one_message call.
This is also a bug fix found in the McSPI into a DM8168 SoC, hanging
all the other channels transfers when a CHCONF_FORCE is present.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
This is a patch RFC following the bug report :
'McSPI hangs with cs_change after "Switch driver to use transfer_one" change'
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2056841
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
index 3d09e0b..db1b655 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
@@ -1217,6 +1217,33 @@ out:
return status;
}
+static int omap2_mcspi_prepare_message(struct spi_master *master,
+ struct spi_message *msg)
+{
+ struct omap2_mcspi *mcspi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
+ struct omap2_mcspi_regs *ctx = &mcspi->ctx;
+ struct omap2_mcspi_cs *cs;
+
+ /* Only a single channel can have the FORCE bit enabled
+ * in its chconf0 register.
+ * Scan all channels and disable them.
+ * A FORCE can remain from a last transfer having cs_change enabled
+ */
+
+ /* Ignore message */
+ (void)msg;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(cs, &ctx->cs, node) {
+ if ((cs->chconf0 & OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_FORCE)) {
+ cs->chconf0 &= ~OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_FORCE;
+ writel_relaxed(cs->chconf0,
+ cs->base + OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF0);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int omap2_mcspi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *t)
{
@@ -1344,6 +1371,7 @@ static int omap2_mcspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(4, 32);
master->setup = omap2_mcspi_setup;
master->auto_runtime_pm = true;
+ master->prepare_message = omap2_mcspi_prepare_message;
master->transfer_one = omap2_mcspi_transfer_one;
master->set_cs = omap2_mcspi_set_cs;
master->cleanup = omap2_mcspi_cleanup;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: disable other channels CHCONF_FORCE in prepare_message
2015-10-08 14:45 [RFC PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: disable other channels CHCONF_FORCE in prepare_message Neil Armstrong
@ 2015-10-08 15:21 ` Michael Welling
2015-10-09 11:38 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Welling @ 2015-10-08 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Armstrong
Cc: Mark Brown, linux-spi, linux-kernel, Fionn Cleary, Wolfram Sang,
Jarkko Nikula, Sebastian Reichel
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Since the "Switch driver to use transfer_one" change, the cs_change
> behavior has changed and a channel chip select can still be
> asserted when changing channel from a previous last transfer in s
> message having the cs_change attribute.
>
> Since there is no sense having multiple chip select being asserted at the
> same time, disable all the remaining forces chip selects in a the
> prepare_message called right before a spi_transfer_one_message call.
>
> This is also a bug fix found in the McSPI into a DM8168 SoC, hanging
> all the other channels transfers when a CHCONF_FORCE is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> This is a patch RFC following the bug report :
> 'McSPI hangs with cs_change after "Switch driver to use transfer_one" change'
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2056841
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> index 3d09e0b..db1b655 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> @@ -1217,6 +1217,33 @@ out:
> return status;
> }
>
> +static int omap2_mcspi_prepare_message(struct spi_master *master,
> + struct spi_message *msg)
> +{
> + struct omap2_mcspi *mcspi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> + struct omap2_mcspi_regs *ctx = &mcspi->ctx;
> + struct omap2_mcspi_cs *cs;
> +
> + /* Only a single channel can have the FORCE bit enabled
> + * in its chconf0 register.
> + * Scan all channels and disable them.
> + * A FORCE can remain from a last transfer having cs_change enabled
> + */
> +
What is the point of doing this void cast below?
Avoiding compiler warning perhaps?
Perhaps you can __maybe_unused for the variable instead?
> + /* Ignore message */
> + (void)msg;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(cs, &ctx->cs, node) {
> + if ((cs->chconf0 & OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_FORCE)) {
> + cs->chconf0 &= ~OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF_FORCE;
> + writel_relaxed(cs->chconf0,
> + cs->base + OMAP2_MCSPI_CHCONF0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int omap2_mcspi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
> struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *t)
> {
> @@ -1344,6 +1371,7 @@ static int omap2_mcspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(4, 32);
> master->setup = omap2_mcspi_setup;
> master->auto_runtime_pm = true;
> + master->prepare_message = omap2_mcspi_prepare_message;
> master->transfer_one = omap2_mcspi_transfer_one;
> master->set_cs = omap2_mcspi_set_cs;
> master->cleanup = omap2_mcspi_cleanup;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: disable other channels CHCONF_FORCE in prepare_message
2015-10-08 15:21 ` Michael Welling
@ 2015-10-09 11:38 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20151009113810.GD1542-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2015-10-09 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Welling
Cc: Neil Armstrong, linux-spi, linux-kernel, Fionn Cleary,
Wolfram Sang, Jarkko Nikula, Sebastian Reichel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 449 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:21:05AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> What is the point of doing this void cast below?
> Avoiding compiler warning perhaps?
> Perhaps you can __maybe_unused for the variable instead?
> > + /* Ignore message */
> > + (void)msg;
You shouldn't need it at all, but yes if there is a good reason to mark
something as unused the above annotation is better.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: disable other channels CHCONF_FORCE in prepare_message
[not found] ` <20151009113810.GD1542-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2015-10-09 14:24 ` Michael Welling
2015-10-14 10:56 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Welling @ 2015-10-09 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: Neil Armstrong, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Fionn Cleary, Wolfram Sang,
Jarkko Nikula, Sebastian Reichel
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:38:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:21:05AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>
> > What is the point of doing this void cast below?
> > Avoiding compiler warning perhaps?
> > Perhaps you can __maybe_unused for the variable instead?
>
> > > + /* Ignore message */
> > > + (void)msg;
>
> You shouldn't need it at all, but yes if there is a good reason to mark
> something as unused the above annotation is better.
Which one?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: disable other channels CHCONF_FORCE in prepare_message
2015-10-09 14:24 ` Michael Welling
@ 2015-10-14 10:56 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2015-10-14 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Welling
Cc: Neil Armstrong, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Fionn Cleary, Wolfram Sang,
Jarkko Nikula, Sebastian Reichel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:24:51AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:38:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:21:05AM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > What is the point of doing this void cast below?
> > > Avoiding compiler warning perhaps?
> > > Perhaps you can __maybe_unused for the variable instead?
> > > > + /* Ignore message */
> > > > + (void)msg;
> > You shouldn't need it at all, but yes if there is a good reason to mark
> > something as unused the above annotation is better.
> Which one?
__maybe_unused.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-14 10:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-08 14:45 [RFC PATCH] spi: omap2-mcspi: disable other channels CHCONF_FORCE in prepare_message Neil Armstrong
2015-10-08 15:21 ` Michael Welling
2015-10-09 11:38 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20151009113810.GD1542-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-09 14:24 ` Michael Welling
2015-10-14 10:56 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).