From: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings-4yDnlxn2s6sWdaTGBSpHTA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
CT kernel
<linux-kernel-81qHHgoATdFT9dQujB1mzip2UmYkHbXO@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi-ti-qspi: Handle truncated frames properly
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:58:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412015809.GS3351@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459885728.26669.7.camel-4yDnlxn2s6sWdaTGBSpHTA@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1062 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:48:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We clamp frame_length to a maximum of 4096, but do not limit the
> number of words written or read properly. This causes 4K reads (which
> some m25p80-like flash chips support) to return garbage for the last
> few bytes.
> Recalculate the length of each transfer, taking the frame length into
> account. Use this length in qspi_{read,write}_msg(), and to increment
> spi_message::actual_length.
I'm having a hard time understanding what's actually wrong here or how
this change is intended to fix it, I think again because I don't know
what frame_length is intended to be. As far as I can tell frame_length
is the number of words we're going to transfer in the entire message and
the driver has in some places been mixing up words and bytes which is
causing the breakage so the intention is to consistently use words
throught the driver. Is that correct?
> - ret = qspi_transfer_msg(qspi, t);
> + wlen = t->bits_per_word >> 3;
For the benefit of readers:
wlen = t->bits_per_word / 8.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-12 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 19:45 [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-ti-qspi: Fix FLEN and WLEN settings if bits_per_word is overridden Ben Hutchings
[not found] ` <1459885528.26669.5.camel-4yDnlxn2s6sWdaTGBSpHTA@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-05 19:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: spi-ti-qspi: Handle truncated frames properly Ben Hutchings
[not found] ` <1459885728.26669.7.camel-4yDnlxn2s6sWdaTGBSpHTA@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-12 1:58 ` Mark Brown [this message]
[not found] ` <20160412015809.GS3351-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-12 11:09 ` Ben Hutchings
[not found] ` <1460459364.32355.6.camel-4yDnlxn2s6sWdaTGBSpHTA@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-13 6:55 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-12 1:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-ti-qspi: Fix FLEN and WLEN settings if bits_per_word is overridden Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20160412013014.GR3351-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-12 11:07 ` Ben Hutchings
[not found] ` <1460459249.32355.4.camel-4yDnlxn2s6sWdaTGBSpHTA@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-13 6:59 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160412015809.GS3351@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben.hutchings-4yDnlxn2s6sWdaTGBSpHTA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-81qHHgoATdFT9dQujB1mzip2UmYkHbXO@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).