From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-ep93xx: simplify GPIO chip selects Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:01:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20170216190109.kvsgigo4wlnaacvm@sirena.org.uk> References: <20170216182614.47941-1-hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fixrrqfhhc57eib4" Cc: linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linus Walleij To: H Hartley Sweeten Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170216182614.47941-1-hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: --fixrrqfhhc57eib4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:26:14AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > This driver requires a GPIO line to be used for the chip select of > each SPI device. This doesn't apply against current code, there's conflicts in the arch code. What's the story here (should I just apply after -rc1?)? --fixrrqfhhc57eib4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlil9vQACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BIjwf+IamMiSJuc7sWtU52GNSMD34VW1UwHuR1vTb4xDZtZcCOnOxsuudLQ+eA e8M/R2nsd8dwek+z1m9STAuphg7vKUruRMS0XvaV8w1l+/NxCYUj7Xm9Qf7Cp4sA 2mSGk+iJ79VhCw5V//ZgeOSOjdZ3CQZ8KIXurD76kxhhOEPt03Kzdd5rT9JTDqOL E3BfQtSUkRNXQoBxhcyyWmXlA2g0cdpj55+ChGzu3y+xhQNKZUTZHrxIrm3vax/Z vc2kBQXfn0RPV4aC+bJ556MoWLYN6Wc1BrAiU6gzS9rVSwIE54AwDPoct3H/p+fJ YgNu/e7ttuXmB2jW4o2wDLfqNeXOZA== =qyqP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fixrrqfhhc57eib4-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html