From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: "Yogesh Gaur" <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>,
"Kamal Dasu" <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Pan" <peterpansjtu@gmail.com>,
"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"Frieder Schrempf" <frieder.schrempf@exceet.de>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
"Cyrille Pitchen" <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] spi: Extend the core to ease integration of SPI memory controllers
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:10:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412171005.5cfaba58@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60f3d53a-9668-9e1c-9f29-45aaf4004630@ti.com>
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:08:28 +0530
Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> mail ID no longer valid.
>
> On Wednesday 11 April 2018 04:14 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Some controllers are exposing high-level interfaces to access various
> > kind of SPI memories. Unfortunately they do not fit in the current
> > spi_controller model and usually have drivers placed in
> > drivers/mtd/spi-nor which are only supporting SPI NORs and not SPI
> > memories in general.
> >
> > This is an attempt at defining a SPI memory interface which works for
> > all kinds of SPI memories (NORs, NANDs, SRAMs).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > +/**
> > + * struct spi_mem_op - describes a SPI memory operation
> > + * @cmd.buswidth: number of IO lines used to transmit the command
> > + * @cmd.opcode: operation opcode
> > + * @addr.nbytes: number of address bytes to send. Can be zero if the operation
> > + * does not need to send an address
> > + * @addr.buswidth: number of IO lines used to transmit the address cycles
> > + * @addr.val: address value. This value is always sent MSB first on the bus.
> > + * Note that only @addr.nbytes are taken into account in this
> > + * address value, so users should make sure the value fits in the
> > + * assigned number of bytes.
> > + * @dummy.nbytes: number of dummy bytes to send after an opcode or address. Can
> > + * be zero if the operation does not require dummy bytes
> > + * @dummy.buswidth: number of IO lanes used to transmit the dummy bytes
> > + * @data.buswidth: number of IO lanes used to send/receive the data
> > + * @data.dir: direction of the transfer
> > + * @data.buf.in: input buffer
> > + * @data.buf.out: output buffer
> > + */
> > +struct spi_mem_op {
> > + struct {
> > + u8 buswidth;
> > + u8 opcode;
> > + } cmd;
> > +
> > + struct {
> > + u8 nbytes;
> > + u8 buswidth;
> > + u64 val;
>
> You could consider using loff_t here and be consistent with
> spi_nor_read/write() API as well as mtd->_read().
Hm, I always have a hard time using types which does not clearly say
how large they are, but okay.
>
> > + } addr;
> > +
> > + struct {
> > + u8 nbytes;
> > + u8 buswidth;
> > + } dummy;
> > +
> > + struct {
> > + u8 buswidth;
> > + enum spi_mem_data_dir dir;
> > + unsigned int nbytes;
> > + /* buf.{in,out} must be DMA-able. */
> > + union {
> > + void *in;
> > + const void *out;
> > + } buf;
> > + } data;
> > +};
> > +
>
> Some flash devices support Dual/Quad DDR (Double Data Rate) mode and the
> SPI controller driver would need to know this information. We will need
> to add a field for that.
Well, let's wait until we actually need that.
>
> Currently, there are drivers under mtd/spi-nor/ that need to know
> page/sector/total size of flash memory(info available in
> -`struct spi_nor). We would need a way to provide this info to spi_mem
> drivers, if we ever plan to move drivers under mtd/spi-nor to spi/
Again, we'll see when we'll try to move them, but I hope still we won't
need that. Looks like the kind of information I'd like to keep away
from spi controller drivers.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-12 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-10 22:44 [PATCH v2 00/10] spi: Extend the framework to generically support memory devices Boris Brezillon
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] spi: Check presence the of ->transfer[_xxx]() before registering a controller Boris Brezillon
2018-04-16 12:13 ` Applied "spi: Check presence the of ->transfer[_xxx]() before registering a controller" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2018-04-26 12:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-26 12:37 ` Mark Brown
2018-04-26 12:54 ` Mark Brown
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] spi: Expose spi_{map,unmap}_buf() for internal use Boris Brezillon
2018-04-16 12:11 ` Mark Brown
2018-04-18 14:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] spi: Add an helper to flush the message queue Boris Brezillon
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] spi: Extend the core to ease integration of SPI memory controllers Boris Brezillon
2018-04-12 14:38 ` Vignesh R
2018-04-12 15:10 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-04-12 19:59 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-17 4:12 ` Vignesh R
2018-04-18 14:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-16 10:33 ` Frieder Schrempf
2018-04-18 14:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] spi: Make support for regular transfers optional when ->mem_ops != NULL Boris Brezillon
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] spi: bcm-qspi: Implement the spi_mem interface Boris Brezillon
2018-05-11 2:56 ` Applied "spi: bcm-qspi: Implement the spi_mem interface" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] spi: bcm53xx: Implement the spi_mem interface Boris Brezillon
2018-04-12 13:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-05-07 9:35 ` Rafał Miłecki
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] spi: ti-qspi: " Boris Brezillon
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] mtd: spi-nor: Use the spi_mem_xx() API Boris Brezillon
2018-05-11 2:55 ` Applied "mtd: spi-nor: Use the spi_mem_xx() API" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2018-04-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] spi: Get rid of the spi_flash_read() API Boris Brezillon
2018-04-17 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] spi: Extend the framework to generically support memory devices Mark Brown
2018-04-18 14:25 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180412171005.5cfaba58@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@exceet.de \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=peterpansjtu@gmail.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).