From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
Cc: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, frieder.schrempf@exceet.de,
computersforpeace@gmail.com, david.wolfe@nxp.com, han.xu@nxp.com,
festevam@gmail.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com,
prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: honour max_data_size for spi-nor writes
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 09:22:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180612092248.4e6a3e92@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r2ldj7xi.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Hi Neil,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:05:13 +1000
NeilBrown <neil@brown.name> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11 2018, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >
> > Also, I'd prefer to have this patch split in 2:
> > 1/ one patch removing the check in spi_nor_write()
> > 2/ and the second patch removing the while() loop in m25p80_write()
> >
> > How about the following commit messages for those 2 patches:
> >
> > 1:
> > "
> > mtd: spi-nor: Support controllers with limited TX FIFO size
> >
> > Some SPI controllers can't write nor->page_size bytes in a single step
> > because their TX FIFO is too small.
>
> I no longer think this is good justification for changes to m25p80 or to
> anything outside the low-level SPI driver. The size of the FIFO is not
> related to the maximum message size.
>
> An SPI transaction involves:
> - asserting chip-select
> - sending/receiving a bunch of bits
> - deasserting chip-select
>
> That middle part of sending/receiving bits can be done:
> - one bit at a time by bit-banging GPIOs
> - 32 bytes at a time by filling a buffer, running the SPI engine, then
> reading results out of the buffer (assuming a 32-byte buffer)
> - with one single DMA operation if the SPI engine can DMA to/from
> main memory
>
> and there are probably other options.
>
> If your SPI engine only handles (say) 32 bytes at a time, then call it
> repeatedly, while holding chip-select asserted the whole time.
Except you're not necessarily in control of the CS signal, and that's
most of the time the case with high-level (Q)SPI mem controllers like
the NXP/FSL QSPI controller (see the datasheet here if you want to check
[1]).
> The SPI
> clock is controlled by the host and in this case it will not have a
> stable frequency for the whole transaction (occasionally pauses), but
> that doesn't matter. The slave just watches for the clock transitions
> and don't care when they come as long as they don't come too fast.
>
> I recently modified the mt7621 spi driver (in drivers/staging) to work
> like this and got much better throughput when reading from spi-nor flash
> memory. It handles writes of full pages (36 bytes at at time!) without
> problems.
Just because you managed to solve the problem in one driver does not
mean the problem does not exist for others. I read this datasheet [1]
several times and couldn't find a way to say 'I want to keep the CS
asserted between 2 transactions', so I think we really need this patch.
Regards,
Boris
[1]https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/VFXXXRM.pdf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-12 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-11 9:18 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: honour max_data_size for spi-nor writes Yogesh Gaur
2018-06-11 9:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-11 22:05 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-12 7:22 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-06-12 22:24 ` NeilBrown
2018-06-12 22:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-13 6:14 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-11 9:32 Yogesh Gaur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180612092248.4e6a3e92@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=david.wolfe@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@exceet.de \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com \
--cc=yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).