From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>
Cc: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI controller
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:03:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210120359.24a2ea9a@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB5726F0DDAC84F1AEC20B56DF99A50@VI1PR04MB5726.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:59:54 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@bootlin.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 4:20 PM
> > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>; linux-
> > mtd@lists.infradead.org; marek.vasut@gmail.com; broonie@kernel.org; linux-
> > spi@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> > mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel@lists.infradead.org; computersforpeace@gmail.com; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI controller
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:43:56 +0000
> > Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Thus, in LUT preparation we have assigned only the base address.
> > > > > Now if I have assigned ahb_buf_size to FSPI_FLSHXXCR0 register
> > > > > then for
> > > > read/write data beyond limit of ahb_buf_size offset I get data corruption.
> > > >
> > > > Why would you do that? We have the ->adjust_op_size() exactly for
> > > > this reason, so, if someone tries to do a spi_mem_op with
> > > > data.nbytes > ahb_buf_size you should return an error.
> > > >
> > > Let me explain my implementation with example. If I have to write data of size
> > 0x100 bytes at offset 0x1200 for CS1, I would program as below:
> > > In func nxp_fspi_select_mem(), would set value of controller address space
> > size, memmap_phy_size, to FSPI_FLSHA2CR0 and rest all FSPI_FLSHXXCR0 as 0.
> > > Value of memmap_phy_size is 0x10000000 i.e. 256 MB for my LX2160ARDB
> > target.
> > > Then in nxp_fspi_prepare_lut(), I would prepare LUT ADDR with address length
> > requirement 3/4 byte for NOR or 1/2/3/4 bytes for NAND flash.
> > > Also for LUT_NXP_WRITE would program data bytes as 0.
> > >
> > > Then inside func nxp_fspi_do_op(), set register FSPI_IPCR0 as the
> > > address offset i.e. 0x1200 and in register FSPI_IPCR1 program the data
> > > size to write i.e. 0x100
> > >
> > > If, as suggested if I tries to mark value of register FSPI_FLSHA2CR0 equal to
> > ahb_buf_size (0x800), then access for address 0x1200 gives me wrong data. This
> > is because as per the controller specification access to flash connected at CS1
> > can be performed under range of FSPI_ FLSHA1CR0 and FSPI_ FLSHA2CR0.
> >
> > Don't you have a way to set an offset to apply to the address accessed through
> > the AHB? And if you don't, how will it work if your mapping is smaller than the
> > flash size?
>
> Write operations are triggered using IP commands instead of AHB command.
> For Read AHB command is used and in this we are adding the offset when performing memcpy_fromIO operation
> memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, (f->ahb_addr + op->addr.val), len);
>
> AHB/IP operations are independent of the way how CS got selected. CS selection depends, e.g. CS1 on the value of register FSPI_FLSHA1CR0 and FSPI_FLSHA2CR0.
>
> Mapping can never going to be smaller than the connected flash size as per discussion with the Board design team and if it's possible by user manually changes the non-soldered part then flash area beyond complete mapping is not accessible.
How unfortunate is that, especially when all that was required was an
extra reg to specify a "flash_offset" to apply to the address passed by
the AHB logic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-10 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-16 11:13 [PATCH v5 0/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI controller Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-11-16 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] " Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-12-06 9:22 ` Schrempf Frieder
2018-12-10 9:41 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-12-10 10:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-10 10:31 ` Schrempf Frieder
2018-12-10 10:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-10 10:43 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-12-10 10:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-10 10:59 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-12-10 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-12-10 11:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-10 11:25 ` Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-12-10 12:11 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-10 10:35 ` Schrempf Frieder
2018-12-10 10:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-16 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: spi: add binding file " Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-11-16 11:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: dts: lx2160a: add FlexSPI node property Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-12-12 8:15 ` Pankaj Bansal
2018-11-16 11:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: defconfig: enable NXP FlexSPI driver Yogesh Narayan Gaur
2018-11-16 11:14 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for the " Yogesh Narayan Gaur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181210120359.24a2ea9a@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).