From: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
To: <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>
Cc: <broonie@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
<Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>,
<Cyrille.Pitchen@microchip.com>, <bugalski.piotr@gmail.com>,
<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: drop wrappers for iomem accesses
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 08:11:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190202081111.0bbc4443@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190202040653.1217-4-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 04:07:19 +0000
<Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com> wrote:
> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
>
> The wrappers hid that the accesses are relaxed. Drop them.
>
> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> ---
> v3: no change
> v2: new patch
>
> drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
> index feeddcb25e1f..131374db0db4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
> @@ -175,17 +175,6 @@ static const struct qspi_mode sama5d2_qspi_modes[] = {
> { 4, 4, 4, QSPI_IFR_WIDTH_QUAD_CMD },
> };
>
> -/* Register access functions */
> -static inline u32 qspi_readl(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg)
> -{
> - return readl_relaxed(aq->regs + reg);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void qspi_writel(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg, u32 value)
> -{
> - writel_relaxed(value, aq->regs + reg);
> -}
> -
> static inline bool is_compatible(const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> const struct qspi_mode *mode)
> {
> @@ -229,6 +218,7 @@ static bool atmel_qspi_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> static int atmel_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> {
> struct atmel_qspi *aq = spi_controller_get_devdata(mem->spi->master);
> + void __iomem *base = aq->regs;
Can we name this variable regs instead of base or even get rid of it
and dereference aq->regs in the xxx_relaxed() calls (doesn't look like
the lines would be over 80 chars even when doing that). With this
addressed, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
> int mode;
> u32 dummy_cycles = 0;
> u32 iar, icr, ifr, sr;
> @@ -240,7 +230,7 @@ static int atmel_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
>
> /* Set the QSPI controller in Serial Memory Mode */
> if (aq->smm != QSPI_MR_SMM) {
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_MR, QSPI_MR_SMM);
> + writel_relaxed(QSPI_MR_SMM, base + QSPI_MR);
> aq->smm = QSPI_MR_SMM;
> }
>
> @@ -300,17 +290,17 @@ static int atmel_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> ifr |= QSPI_IFR_TFRTYP_TRSFR_WRITE;
>
> /* Clear pending interrupts */
> - (void)qspi_readl(aq, QSPI_SR);
> + (void)readl_relaxed(base + QSPI_SR);
>
> /* Set QSPI Instruction Frame registers */
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_IAR, iar);
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_ICR, icr);
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_IFR, ifr);
> + writel_relaxed(iar, base + QSPI_IAR);
> + writel_relaxed(icr, base + QSPI_ICR);
> + writel_relaxed(ifr, base + QSPI_IFR);
>
> /* Skip to the final steps if there is no data */
> if (op->data.nbytes) {
> /* Dummy read of QSPI_IFR to synchronize APB and AHB accesses */
> - (void)qspi_readl(aq, QSPI_IFR);
> + (void)readl_relaxed(base + QSPI_IFR);
>
> /* Send/Receive data */
> if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN)
> @@ -321,22 +311,22 @@ static int atmel_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> op->data.buf.out, op->data.nbytes);
>
> /* Release the chip-select */
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_CR, QSPI_CR_LASTXFER);
> + writel_relaxed(QSPI_CR_LASTXFER, base + QSPI_CR);
> }
>
> /* Poll INSTRuction End status */
> - sr = qspi_readl(aq, QSPI_SR);
> + sr = readl_relaxed(base + QSPI_SR);
> if ((sr & QSPI_SR_CMD_COMPLETED) == QSPI_SR_CMD_COMPLETED)
> return err;
>
> /* Wait for INSTRuction End interrupt */
> reinit_completion(&aq->cmd_completion);
> aq->pending = sr & QSPI_SR_CMD_COMPLETED;
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_IER, QSPI_SR_CMD_COMPLETED);
> + writel_relaxed(QSPI_SR_CMD_COMPLETED, base + QSPI_IER);
> if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&aq->cmd_completion,
> msecs_to_jiffies(1000)))
> err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_IDR, QSPI_SR_CMD_COMPLETED);
> + writel_relaxed(QSPI_SR_CMD_COMPLETED, base + QSPI_IDR);
>
> return err;
> }
> @@ -375,18 +365,20 @@ static int atmel_qspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> scbr--;
>
> scr = QSPI_SCR_SCBR(scbr);
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_SCR, scr);
> + writel_relaxed(scr, aq->regs + QSPI_SCR);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int atmel_qspi_init(struct atmel_qspi *aq)
> {
> + void __iomem *base = aq->regs;
> +
> /* Reset the QSPI controller */
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_CR, QSPI_CR_SWRST);
> + writel_relaxed(QSPI_CR_SWRST, base + QSPI_CR);
>
> /* Enable the QSPI controller */
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_CR, QSPI_CR_QSPIEN);
> + writel_relaxed(QSPI_CR_QSPIEN, base + QSPI_CR);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -394,10 +386,11 @@ static int atmel_qspi_init(struct atmel_qspi *aq)
> static irqreturn_t atmel_qspi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct atmel_qspi *aq = (struct atmel_qspi *)dev_id;
> + void __iomem *base = aq->regs;
> u32 status, mask, pending;
>
> - status = qspi_readl(aq, QSPI_SR);
> - mask = qspi_readl(aq, QSPI_IMR);
> + status = readl_relaxed(base + QSPI_SR);
> + mask = readl_relaxed(base + QSPI_IMR);
> pending = status & mask;
>
> if (!pending)
> @@ -503,7 +496,7 @@ static int atmel_qspi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct atmel_qspi *aq = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctrl);
>
> spi_unregister_controller(ctrl);
> - qspi_writel(aq, QSPI_CR, QSPI_CR_QSPIDIS);
> + writel_relaxed(QSPI_CR_QSPIDIS, aq->regs + QSPI_CR);
> clk_disable_unprepare(aq->clk);
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-02 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-02 4:07 [PATCH v3 00/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: introduce sam9x60 qspi controller Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: cache MR value to avoid a write access Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 7:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 8:38 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 13:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: order header files inclusion alphabetically Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: drop wrappers for iomem accesses Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 7:11 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-02-02 8:44 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 13:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: fix naming scheme Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 7:12 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: remove unnecessary cast Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: return appropriate error code Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: switch to SPDX license identifiers Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: drop unused and NOP transfer macros Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 7:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 8:46 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 13:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] dt-bindings: spi: atmel-quadspi: update example to new clock binding Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] dt-bindings: spi: atmel-quadspi: make "pclk" mandatory Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 7:15 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 8:47 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: add support for named peripheral clock Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 7:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] dt-bindings: spi: atmel-quadspi: QuadSPI driver for Microchip SAM9X60 Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 7:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 4:07 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] spi: atmel-quadspi: add support for sam9x60 qspi controller Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 7:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-02 8:58 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-02-02 13:30 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190202081111.0bbc4443@bbrezillon \
--to=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=Cyrille.Pitchen@microchip.com \
--cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bugalski.piotr@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).