From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@t-platforms.ru>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: Clear SPI_CS_HIGH flag from bad_bits for GPIO chip-select
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:30:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426103007.29612-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> (raw)
When GPIO chip-select is used nothing prevents any available SPI
controllers to work with both CS-high and traditional CS-low modes.
In fact the SPI bus core code already does it, so we don't need to
introduce any modification there. But spi_setup() still fails to
switch the interface settings if CS-high flag is set for the case
of GPIO-driven slave chip-select when the SPI controller doesn't
support the hardwired CS-inversion. Lets fix it by clearing the
SPI_CS_HIGH flag out from bad_bits (unsupported by controller) when
client chip is selected by GPIO.
This feature is useful for slave devices, which in accordance with
communication protocol can work with both active-high and active-low
chip-selects. I am aware of one such device. It is MMC-SPI interface,
when at init sequence the driver needs to perform a read operation with
low and high chip-select sequentially (requirement of 74 clock cycles
with both chipselect, see the mmc_spi driver for details).
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 93986f879b09..49808892ef35 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -2943,6 +2943,11 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
* so it is ignored here.
*/
bad_bits = spi->mode & ~(spi->controller->mode_bits | SPI_CS_WORD);
+ /* nothing prevents from working with active-high CS in case if it
+ * is driven by GPIO.
+ */
+ if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
+ bad_bits &= ~SPI_CS_HIGH;
ugly_bits = bad_bits &
(SPI_TX_DUAL | SPI_TX_QUAD | SPI_TX_OCTAL |
SPI_RX_DUAL | SPI_RX_QUAD | SPI_RX_OCTAL);
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-26 10:30 Serge Semin [this message]
2019-04-27 17:32 ` Applied "spi: Clear SPI_CS_HIGH flag from bad_bits for GPIO chip-select" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2019-05-02 2:18 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190426103007.29612-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--to=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=Sergey.Semin@t-platforms.ru \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).