From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev: Add dhcom-board to compatibility list
 [Klartext]
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:56:02 +0100
Message-ID: <20190516155602.GH5598@sirena.org.uk>
References: <kcis.7DC7E250415B4C2E9DA25490D6832213@DHPLMX01>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N8ia4yKhAKKETby7"
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <kcis.7DC7E250415B4C2E9DA25490D6832213@DHPLMX01>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org


--N8ia4yKhAKKETby7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:48:10PM +0000, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:

> You are right, it has something do to with encryption on our mailing server.
> I am in contact with our IT department to fix this issue.
> Should I resend the patch when this issue is fixed?

This is already the second time you sent it today, the other time didn't
have this problem.

--N8ia4yKhAKKETby7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlzdiBIACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9AWxAf9HlPgqvZTVahRW3CfddQctwPCo7feSgJDs9NW7GSx/CRLWlNpAXj+Bi0Q
TO03hjqaSgez+yU/ptkYZDIy7Xh+G6R2O8BZ0avQGT/fv9YNa98pjGj6MJaClb0q
6xgsDauTMzvAScwgc1h8YRXfNvkjb258SjxmYFwA0JcZZAeXORd15ZuvLB7RXau+
Yv00Ru97EXjxK0qHKr/NWs5QJ4jPaSBqPKqWtzNC2sUndNz7/eUr3C4rdsGTXBXH
/sBYUU/t8XT33fEA+Bl7Rlxc09DqJWek+V8t/O4sOtezxgKPFrOdEFt4ManISbX5
tRXLJayyjQHV61ZRG+CbObjgh/UrPw==
=BvsO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--N8ia4yKhAKKETby7--