From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] docs: i2c: convert to ReST and add to driver-api bookset Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:41:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20190628214138.GU3692@piout.net> References: <3997b54a2e73887b96ec665573f08ded78b71421.1561756511.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Peter Rosin , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Andreas Werner , Wolfram Sang , Rudolf Marek , Seth Heasley , Neil Horman , Vadim Pasternak , Michael Shych , Ajay Gupta , Peter Korsgaard , Andrew Lunn , Jim Cromie , Mark Bro To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3997b54a2e73887b96ec665573f08ded78b71421.1561756511.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On 28/06/2019 18:23:14-0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c > index 225a8df1d4e9..1803f3cab39f 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ > */ > /* > * It would be more efficient to use i2c msgs/i2c_transfer directly but, as > - * recommened in .../Documentation/i2c/writing-clients section > + * recommened in .../Documentation/i2c/writing-clients.rst section > * "Sending and receiving", using SMBus level communication is preferred. > */ > Honestly, the whole comment could be removed. The current trend is to move everything to regmap anyway. However, I'm fine with that change if you want to keep it that way (and probably scripted). -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com