From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH spi for-5.4 0/5] Deterministic SPI latency with NXP DSPI driver Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 07:08:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20190821140815.GA1447@localhost> References: <20190818182600.3047-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20190821043845.GB1332@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mark Brown , Hubert Feurstein , mlichvar@redhat.com, Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, netdev To: Vladimir Oltean Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190821043845.GB1332@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:38:45PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: > Overall, the PTP switch use case is well supported by Linux. The > synchronization of the management CPU to the PTP, while nice to have, > is not required to implement a Transparent Clock. Your specific > application might require it, but honestly, if the management CPU > needs good synchronization, then you really aught to feed a PPS from > the switch into a gpio (for example) on the CPU. Another way to achieve this is to have a second MAC interface on the management CPU connected to a spare port on the switch. Then time stamping, PHC, ptp4l, and phc2sys work as expected. Thanks, Richard