From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Jay Fang <f.fangjian@huawei.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, huangdaode@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Add HiSilicon SPI controller driver support
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 19:18:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210308181839.GA6444@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210308141101.GC4656@sirena.org.uk>
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 02:11:01PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 03:43:13PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Transfers may still be ongoing until spi_unregister_controller() returns.
> > (It's called from devres_release_all() in this case.) Since the IRQ is
> > presumably necessary to handle those transfers, freeing the IRQ after
> > unregistering is actually correct. So the code looks fine in principle.
> > However, because the IRQ is requested with IRQF_SHARED, the handler may
> > be invoked at any time, even after the controller has been unregistered.
> > It is therefore necessary to quiesce the SPI controller's interrupt on
> > unregistering and it is also necessary to check in the IRQ handler whether
> > an interrupt is actually pending (and bail out if not).
>
> It's also important and even more of a concern that even if there is a
> valid interrupt the handler doesn't try to use structures that might
> have been deallocated before the handler uses it as this controller
> does, that will segfault which is more serious.
At least struct spi_controller and struct hisi_spi are allocated with
devm_*() before the call to devm_request_irq(), hence those two
are always accessible from the IRQ handler AFAICS.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-01 11:56 [PATCH] spi: Add HiSilicon SPI controller driver support Jay Fang
2021-03-01 13:54 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-04 6:54 ` Fangjian (Jay)
[not found] ` <79a0bb79-654b-8afc-f34a-c3a08bae275c@huawei.com>
2021-03-04 12:34 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-08 11:24 ` Jay Fang
2021-03-07 14:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-03-08 14:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-08 18:18 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2021-03-08 18:28 ` Mark Brown
2021-03-09 9:13 ` Jay Fang
2021-03-07 14:36 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-03-08 3:57 ` Jay Fang
2021-03-08 8:06 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210308181839.GA6444@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fangjian@huawei.com \
--cc=huangdaode@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).