From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, rjui@broadcom.com, sbranden@broadcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, nsaenz@kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca,
p.rosenberger@kunbus.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm2835: do not unregister controller in shutdown handler
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 18:54:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211001175422.GA53652@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210928195657.5573-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1985 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 09:56:57PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> One example is if the BCM2835 driver is used together with the TPM SPI
> driver:
> At system shutdown first the TPM chip devices (pre) shutdown handler
> (tpm_class_shutdown) is called, stopping the chip and setting an operations
> pointer to NULL.
> Then since the BCM2835 shutdown handler unregisters the SPI controller the
> TPM SPI remove function (tpm_tis_spi_remove) is also called. In case of
> TPM 2 this function accesses the now nullified operations pointer,
> resulting in the following NULL pointer access:
This is a bug in that driver, it should be able to cope with a race
between a removal (which might be triggered for some other reason) and a
shutdown. Obviously this is actively triggered by this code path but it
could happen via some other mechanism.
> The first attempt to fix this was with an extra check in the tpm chip
> driver (see https://marc.info/?l=linux-integrity&m=163129718414118&w=2) to
> avoid the NULL pointer access.
> Then Jason Gunthorpe noted that the real issue was the BCM driver
> unregistering the chip in the shutdown handler(see
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-integrity&m=163129718414118&w=2) which led
> me to this solution.
Whatever happens here you should still fix the driver.
> -static int bcm2835_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static void bcm2835_spi_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct bcm2835_spi *bs = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr);
>
> - bcm2835_debugfs_remove(bs);
> -
> - spi_unregister_controller(ctlr);
> -
> bcm2835_dma_release(ctlr, bs);
It is not at all clear to me that it is safe to deallocate the DMA
resources the controller is using without first releasing the
controller, I don't see what's stopping something coming along and
submitting new transactions which could in turn try to start doing
DMA.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-01 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 19:56 [PATCH] spi: bcm2835: do not unregister controller in shutdown handler Lino Sanfilippo
2021-09-28 20:08 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 8:38 ` Aw: " Lino Sanfilippo
2021-10-01 17:54 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-10-03 15:25 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-10-04 12:49 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-04 13:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-04 14:12 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-04 15:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-04 16:31 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-04 16:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-04 16:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-04 16:55 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-04 17:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-04 17:27 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-04 17:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-04 17:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-04 17:56 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-04 17:05 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-04 16:52 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-04 16:57 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-04 18:30 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2021-10-04 18:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211001175422.GA53652@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=p.rosenberger@kunbus.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).