linux-spi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
	Jaime Liao <jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] spi: spi-mem: Kill the spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() helper
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:58:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211221105803.1596cf89@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220185840.ox5hs44hej6nhkxo@ti.com>

Hi Pratyush,

p.yadav@ti.com wrote on Tue, 21 Dec 2021 00:28:42 +0530:

> On 17/12/21 05:16PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Now that spi_mem_default_supports_op() has access to the static
> > controller capabilities (related to memory operations), and now that
> > these capabilities have been filled by the impacted controllers, there
> > is no need for a specific helper checking only DTR operations, so let's
> > just kill spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() and simply use
> > spi_mem_default_supports_op() instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c |  5 +----
> >  drivers/spi/spi-mem.c             | 10 ----------
> >  drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c            | 10 +---------
> >  include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h       | 11 -----------
> >  4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > index e137b1ec85d4..67d05ee8d6a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c
> > @@ -335,8 +335,6 @@ static int mxic_spi_data_xfer(struct mxic_spi *mxic, const void *txbuf,
> >  static bool mxic_spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >  				     const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >  {
> > -	bool all_false;
> > -
> >  	if (op->data.buswidth > 8 || op->addr.buswidth > 8 ||
> >  	    op->dummy.buswidth > 8 || op->cmd.buswidth > 8)
> >  		return false;
> > @@ -348,13 +346,7 @@ static bool mxic_spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >  	if (op->addr.nbytes > 7)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > -	all_false = !op->cmd.dtr && !op->addr.dtr && !op->dummy.dtr &&
> > -		    !op->data.dtr;
> > -
> > -	if (all_false)
> > -		return spi_mem_default_supports_op(mem, op);
> > -	else
> > -		return spi_mem_dtr_supports_op(mem, op);
> > +	return spi_mem_default_supports_op(mem, op);  
> 
> Does this controller support mixed DTR modes? If it doesn't then it 
> should reject mixed DTR ops before calling 
> spi_mem_default_supports_op(). Anyway, the current driver doesn't check 
> for it either so this change does not make anything worse at the very 
> least.

The Cadence SPI driver does something like:

all_true = cmd.dtr && addr.dtr ...;
all_false = !cmd.dtr && !addr.dtr ...;
if (!all_true || !all_false)
	return false;

This basically rules out any mixed DTR operation.

I believe Macronix code is inspired from this function, but they
intentionally dropped the all_true check, making the situation boolean:
either there is at least one DTR op, or there is none. So I believe
this was done on purpose and this controller supports mixed DTR ops.

> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-21  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17 16:16 [PATCH v7 00/14] External ECC engines & Macronix support Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] spi: spi-mem: Fix a DTR related check in spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:39   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21  9:50     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 10:15       ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] spi: spi-mem: Introduce a capability structure Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:43   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21  9:35     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] spi: spi-mem: Check the controller extra capabilities Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:48   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] spi: cadence: Provide a capability structure Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:55   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 10:16     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 10:41       ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 11:19         ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-21 12:05           ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-01-03  8:38             ` Boris Brezillon
2022-01-03  9:18               ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] spi: mxic: " Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] spi: spi-mem: Kill the spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() helper Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 18:58   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21  9:58     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-12-21 10:10       ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 10:25         ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] spi: spi-mem: Add an ecc_en parameter to the spi_mem_op structure Miquel Raynal
2021-12-20 19:02   ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-21 17:37     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] mtd: spinand: Delay a little bit the dirmap creation Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] mtd: spinand: Create direct mapping descriptors for ECC operations Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] spi: mxic: Fix the transmit path Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] spi: mxic: Create a helper to configure the controller before an operation Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] spi: mxic: Create a helper to ease the start of " Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] spi: mxic: Add support for direct mapping Miquel Raynal
2021-12-17 16:16 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] spi: mxic: Add support for pipelined ECC operations Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211221105803.1596cf89@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).