From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8844C433EF for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238481AbiA0JU7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 04:20:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60910 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238480AbiA0JU6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 04:20:58 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::227]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC1CC061714 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 01:20:58 -0800 (PST) Received: (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEA9C20010; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:20:52 +0100 From: Miquel Raynal To: Mark Brown Cc: Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tudor Ambarus , Pratyush Yadav , Michael Walle , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Julien Su , Jaime Liao , Thomas Petazzoni , Boris Brezillon , Xiangsheng Hou Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/13] spi: spi-mem: Introduce a capability structure Message-ID: <20220127102052.5d6d5bc0@xps13> In-Reply-To: References: <20220104083631.40776-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20220126105333.883267-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20220126183601.42d38e88@xps13> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.7 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, broonie@kernel.org wrote on Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:41:31 +0000: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 06:36:01PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > I was hoping to review this stuff? I think I was expecting it to be > > > rebased after the merge window... > > > Sorry for the misunderstanding, I thought you were fine with these > > spi bits so I didn't ping you before applying. Can you review the v9 > > then? There is nothing different in the series I applied. > > > Depending on the outcome I'll either fix inline if you ack the patches > > or drop the patches from that branch and send a v10 otherwise. > > I don't recall seeing anything but I'd dropped them due to the merge > window, like I say I was expecting a repost for -rc1. I'll try to fish > them out and have a look tomorrow. No worries, I've re-sent exactly the patches currently applied on the spi-mem-ecc branch (so the rebased ones). Take your time for reviewing them and depending on how it goes I will introduce your Acks inline or send a v11 if it is needed. Thanks, Miquèl