From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Miguel Angel Ajo <majopela@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bcm2711 / RPi4 not functional after d62069c22eda
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:59:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220318125925.GA21543@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC3B9fkpO13QhCgVO-qyynbwdh_z60CKgpUhn-40NyGNGz_q8Q@mail.gmail.com>
[cc += linux-spi; please do not write developers directly without cc'ing
relevant lists]
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:54:35AM +0100, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:47 AM Miguel Angel Ajo <majopela@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > I wanted to share a regression found after commit:
> >
> > d62069c22eda spi: bcm2835: Remove shared interrupt support
[...]
> > After this commit I get:
> >
> > [root@rpi4-64 ~]# dmesg | grep spi
> > [ 18.781250] spi-bcm2835 fe204000.spi: could not register SPI
> > controller: -517
> > [ 19.134138] spi-bcm2835 fe204000.spi: could not register SPI
> > controller: -517
> > [ 19.895147] spi-bcm2835 fe204000.spi: could not register SPI
> > controller: -517
> > [ 20.400137] spi-bcm2835 fe204000.spi: could not register SPI
> > controller: -517
Those are transient errors, -517 is -EPROBE_DEFER. Probing fails
because a resource is not available (yet), to be retried again later
if/when it becomes available.
> > ecfbd3c introduced support for the bcm2711 SoC that shares
> > one interrupt over multiple spi controller instances.
> >
> > Do we have a more detailed description of the exact issue for
> > which we reverted?, is there a plan to re-introduce the shared interrupt
> > support while fixing the issue?
See here for why the commit was reverted:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20200529174358.som3snunfxch6phi@wunner.de/
There was a second attempt to introduce shared interrupt support,
but after a lengthy discussion, it was not pursued to fruition:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20200604212819.715-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com/
So I believe shared interrupt support only exists in the Raspberry Pi
Foundation's downstream kernel, but not yet in the mainline kernel.
Thanks,
Lukas
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-18 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAC3B9fn9DWezr3rspLbomuRLtRjSvW89cLMWR9TTCYsX=PDM_w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAC3B9fkpO13QhCgVO-qyynbwdh_z60CKgpUhn-40NyGNGz_q8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-18 12:59 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2022-03-18 15:31 ` bcm2711 / RPi4 not functional after d62069c22eda Florian Fainelli
2022-03-18 16:17 ` Miguel Angel Ajo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220318125925.GA21543@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majopela@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox