linux-spi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mukesh Savaliya <msavaliy@codeaurora.org>,
	Akash Asthana <akashast@codeaurora.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: qcom-qspi: Add minItems to interconnect-names
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 23:46:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220328181638.GA16448@9a2d8922b8f1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42c32324-ce22-ae37-6118-35590f4e355c@kernel.org>

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:21:34PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/03/2022 22:21, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> > Qualcomm QSPI DT spec says interconnects has minimum length 1 and
> > maximum length 2. Same configuration will be applicable for
> > interconnect-names. Schema currently depicts interconnects length
> > correctly but not interconnect-names. It can have a single entry, which
> > is a valid case yet to be incorporated in the current configuration. The
> > schema tries to look for 2 names and fail for DTs with a single entry.
> > Thus, add minItems property to interconnect-names to fix it.
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> 
> 6 sentences which explaining the same, which could be written in one
> sentence. In the same time you actually do not explain whether having
> one interconnect is correct. You just say what DT spec says about
> interconnects, but maybe that's wrong.

Though commit desscription is subject to personal perspective, but I
also see some duplication here and will submit v2 with a shorter
description.

> 
> So either keep just one sentence or really explain why one or two are
> allowed (based on datasheet for example).

Please see commit 8f9c291558ea, interconnect properties were added by
one of maintainers of qcom-qspi. And it's been sometime this change is
in-tree with no regressions introduced. So, I don't think we should
double check this change. My change simply define minItem constraint to
interconnect-names which is already existing on interconnects.

-Kuldeep

      reply	other threads:[~2022-03-28 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-26 21:21 [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: qcom-qspi: Add minItems to interconnect-names Kuldeep Singh
2022-03-27 19:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-28 18:16   ` Kuldeep Singh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220328181638.GA16448@9a2d8922b8f1 \
    --to=singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=akashast@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=msavaliy@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).