From: Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@microchip.com>
To: <broonie@kernel.org>, <david@protonic.nl>
Cc: <andrew@lunn.ch>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<mkl@pengutronix.de>, <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/3] drivers: spi: spi.c: Don't use the message queue if possible in spi_sync
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:47:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220715074710.2760-1-thomas.kopp@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqcmANJXrsLXI6LB@sirena.org.uk>
Hi David, All,
I'd like to test this patchseries but am not sure what the current state is.
Is there an updated patch series with the changes discussed after the initial RFC or should I just test that?
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-15 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 14:29 [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Optimize spi_sync path David Jander
2022-05-25 14:29 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] drivers: spi: API: spi_finalize_current_message -> spi_finalize_message David Jander
2022-05-25 14:29 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/3] drivers: spi: spi.c: Move ctlr->cur_msg_prepared to struct spi_message David Jander
2022-05-25 14:29 ` [RFC] [PATCH 3/3] drivers: spi: spi.c: Don't use the message queue if possible in spi_sync David Jander
2022-05-25 14:46 ` David Jander
2022-06-07 18:30 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-08 7:54 ` David Jander
2022-06-08 11:29 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-09 15:34 ` David Jander
2022-06-09 16:31 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-10 7:27 ` David Jander
2022-06-10 13:41 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-10 18:17 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-13 9:05 ` David Jander
2022-06-13 11:56 ` Mark Brown
2022-07-15 7:47 ` Thomas Kopp [this message]
2022-07-15 9:02 ` Thomas Kopp
2022-06-08 13:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-08 14:55 ` David Jander
2022-05-30 12:06 ` [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Optimize spi_sync path Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220715074710.2760-1-thomas.kopp@microchip.com \
--to=thomas.kopp@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).