From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: spi: renesas,sh-msiof: Fix 'unevaluatedProperties' warnings
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 23:03:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220829220334.6379-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> (raw)
With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, there's a number of
warnings when running dtbs_check:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77951-ulcb-kf.dtb: spi@e6e90000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('power-domains', 'resets' were unexpected)
From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,sh-msiof.yaml
The main problem is that SoC DTSI's include power-domains and resets
property, whereas the renesas,sh-msiof.yaml has 'unevaluatedProperties:
false'. So just add optional power-domains and resets properties.
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
---
v1->v2
* Set maxItems to 1
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cae2f59a-aeeb-e573-029f-7151ae29dd28@linaro.org/T/
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,sh-msiof.yaml | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,sh-msiof.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,sh-msiof.yaml
index 5de710adfa63..78c958b22f32 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,sh-msiof.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,sh-msiof.yaml
@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ properties:
clocks:
maxItems: 1
+ power-domains:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ resets:
+ maxItems: 1
+
num-cs:
description: |
Total number of chip selects (default is 1).
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 22:03 Lad Prabhakar [this message]
2022-08-30 7:20 ` [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: spi: renesas,sh-msiof: Fix 'unevaluatedProperties' warnings Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-30 9:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-08-30 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-30 10:49 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220829220334.6379-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--to=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).