Linux SPI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
Cc: radu_nicolae.pirea@upb.ro, richard.genoud@gmail.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com,
	alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/39] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: add compatible for sam9x7.
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:02:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240224-kimono-stress-898eae80abd3@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223172559.672142-1-varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2347 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:55:59PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add sam9x7 compatible to DT bindings documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Fixed the wrong addition of compatible
> - Added further compatibles that are possible correct (as per DT)
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> index 65cb2e5c5eee..30af537e8e81 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> @@ -23,11 +23,17 @@ properties:
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
>        - items:
> -          - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +          - enum:
> +              - microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-usart
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
>        - items:
> -          - const: microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
> -          - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +          - enum:
> +              - microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-dbgu

> +          - enum:
> +              - microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-usart

This doesn't make sense - this enum should be a const.
I don't really understand the idea behind of the original binding here that
allowed:
"microchip,sam9x60-dbgu", "microchip,sam9x60-usart", "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu", "atmel,at91sam9260-usart"

Specifically, I don't get the purpose of the "microchip,sam9x60-usart".
Either make it
      - items:
          - enum:
              - microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
              - microchip,sam9x7-dbgu
          - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
or add
      - items:
          - const: microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
or explain exactly why this needs to be
"chipa-dgbu", "chipa-usart", "chipb-dbgu", "chipb-dbgu"

Thanks,
Conor.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-24 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23 17:13 [PATCH v4 00/39] Add support for sam9x7 SoC family Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-23 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 12/39] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: add compatible for sam9x7 Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-24 20:02   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-02-28  7:03     ` Varshini.Rajendran
2024-02-28 11:49       ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-29  8:55         ` Varshini.Rajendran
2024-02-29 18:26           ` Conor Dooley
2024-02-23 17:26 ` [PATCH v4 16/39] spi: dt-bindings: atmel,at91rm9200-spi: remove 9x60 compatible from list Varshini Rajendran
2024-02-26  9:09   ` Tudor Ambarus
2024-02-28  9:28     ` Varshini.Rajendran
2024-02-28  9:38       ` Tudor Ambarus
2024-02-24  1:18 ` (subset) [PATCH v4 00/39] Add support for sam9x7 SoC family Mark Brown
2024-02-27  1:21 ` Andi Shyti
2024-02-27  3:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-02-28 15:53 ` (subset) " Mark Brown
2024-03-01 10:51 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240224-kimono-stress-898eae80abd3@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=radu_nicolae.pirea@upb.ro \
    --cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=varshini.rajendran@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox