From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7C063D; Sat, 18 May 2024 01:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715994296; cv=none; b=AtmkFRiA0k0EYarNBNMdn7eAnUKfefvdsB0O7KNdmZvtnXTgW8FDbhPbl+TCLGSXXZnnG0tXmqAnJEMk5te56VNIB9qnk9p4Pz/0lRiIOIfKUao9YYW18G3HpLcAt+AKcw8nG4yVxk5YLoiMl91xI2A27IP/gtUIwhJPJBQKUeQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715994296; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bHRgCULzYi8tSfZSqZ6z5UO8unETsb/ASwHz4ppE7k8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XrhwUwivaTo9ZQu6D+DA0G+eojCuV8HHIKaCqTMk2LBvcn0lgNdJ5fy3hUUUYgAQGTy5wO0VwH9W+g4hWy2olkOBhKiIjU6f0nUwaoO3lIz9u6Zd0/bzXcG91DUPv4Znu/XAxD5SKrC/5xP7NReblRUrjQy6cjdzZNjXiDbKIlQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=GIUkOrBF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GIUkOrBF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715994294; x=1747530294; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=bHRgCULzYi8tSfZSqZ6z5UO8unETsb/ASwHz4ppE7k8=; b=GIUkOrBFvMJbrq1FTjpuvMCuQEBbo/mgWLvEsXslBr4Kk81fA8XOKHg5 JsuaweSk93kHh0dKVKkG8GhMzteCGCZdg+YsJ3dSXXvHjYrZFGtoBmZWf KpBxfoHQLOqqPtB91UWTdndnVl6vWPzc0qfnvJbftbFndQDxnyIgekT/U UEtVzRYPpTl08IN7yE3h2ml8n5/+hJFmPYGbf+gPysNIV35MJmNXbIhuz L/cN0Bgn+PpR3ceq4pL8fBi/Q1F/q1vGdD47KLEi7xrLs/wmynFHPzyMd payFsHHdoqdvglGuk0DCxJQL4BofqbSMk8mMmmIF+GVlUSKCxz6C0JgXq g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: htaml7Y8RbSmLeduBNDDgw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fbff3wy3QtGZx6Wc/9yszw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11075"; a="12306128" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,169,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="12306128" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 May 2024 18:04:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cTE87pGATkufBRA0am2S+g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: P9mlfLqDTjOPj4RIAFx1qQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,169,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="32375877" Received: from unknown (HELO 108735ec233b) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 May 2024 18:04:50 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 108735ec233b with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s88Uq-0001Si-0v; Sat, 18 May 2024 01:04:31 +0000 Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 09:03:53 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Eddie James , linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, andi.shyti@kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, alistair@popple.id.au, jk@ozlabs.org, andrew@codeconstruct.com.au, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, eajames@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 37/40] fsi: core: Add different types of CFAM Message-ID: <202405180824.hYqwNWNv-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240516181907.3468796-38-eajames@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240516181907.3468796-38-eajames@linux.ibm.com> Hi Eddie, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on andi-shyti/i2c/i2c-host] [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next broonie-spi/for-next linus/master v6.9 next-20240517] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Eddie-James/fsi-hub-Set-master-index-to-link-number-plus-one/20240517-023205 base: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git i2c/i2c-host patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240516181907.3468796-38-eajames%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 37/40] fsi: core: Add different types of CFAM config: nios2-randconfig-r071-20240517 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240518/202405180824.hYqwNWNv-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240518/202405180824.hYqwNWNv-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405180824.hYqwNWNv-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c:1113:27: warning: no previous prototype for 'fsi_get_cfam_type' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 1113 | const struct device_type *fsi_get_cfam_type(u32 id) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/fsi_get_cfam_type +1113 drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c 1112 > 1113 const struct device_type *fsi_get_cfam_type(u32 id) 1114 { 1115 u32 major = (id & 0xf00) >> 8; 1116 u32 minor = (id & 0xf0) >> 4; 1117 1118 switch (major) { 1119 case 0x9: 1120 return &cfam_s_type; 1121 case 0xc: 1122 if (minor == 0) 1123 return &cfam_ody_type; 1124 fallthrough; 1125 case 0xd: 1126 default: 1127 return &cfam_type; 1128 } 1129 } 1130 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki