[PATCH 2/2] spi: s3c64xx: update flush_fifo timeout code

[Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>]

The code that checks for loops in the s3c6xx_flush_fifo() checks
for loops being non-zero as a timeout, however the code /could/
finish with loops being zero and the fifo being flushed...

Also, it would be useful to know what is left in the fifo for this
error case, so update the checks to see what is left, and then also
print the number of entries.

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 6ab416a33966..7b244e1fd58a 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ static void s3c64xx_flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
 		val = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
 	} while (TX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd) && --loops);
 
-	if (loops == 0)
-		dev_warn(&sdd->pdev->dev, "Timed out flushing TX FIFO\n");
+	if (TX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd))
+		dev_warn(&sdd->pdev->dev, "Timed out flushing TX FIFO (%d left)\n", TX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd));
 
 	/* Flush RxFIFO*/
 	loops = msecs_to_loops(1);
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ static void s3c64xx_flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
 			break;
 	} while (--loops);
 
-	if (loops == 0)
-		dev_warn(&sdd->pdev->dev, "Timed out flushing RX FIFO\n");
+	if (RX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd))
+		dev_warn(&sdd->pdev->dev, "Timed out flushing RX FIFO (%d left)\n", RX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd));
 
 	val = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_CH_CFG);
 	val &= ~S3C64XX_SPI_CH_SW_RST;
-- 
2.37.2.352.g3c44437643