From: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
To: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>, Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>,
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: nxp-fspi: Use reinit_completion() for repeated operations
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 20:47:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260304-spi-nxp-v2-2-cd7d7726a27e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260304-spi-nxp-v2-0-cd7d7726a27e@gmail.com>
The driver currently calls init_completion() during every spi_mem_op.
Tchnically it may work, but it's not the recommended pattern.
According to the kernel documentation: Calling init_completion() on
the same completion object twice is most likely a bug as it
re-initializes the queue to an empty queue and enqueued tasks
could get "lost" - use reinit_completion() in that case, but be
aware of other races.
So moves the initial initialization to probe function and uses
reinit_completion() for subsequent operations.
Fixes: a5356aef6a90 ("spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI controller")
Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
index 320b3d93df57..1e36ae084dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ static int nxp_fspi_do_op(struct nxp_fspi *f, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
reg = reg | FSPI_IPRXFCR_CLR;
fspi_writel(f, reg, base + FSPI_IPRXFCR);
- init_completion(&f->c);
+ reinit_completion(&f->c);
fspi_writel(f, op->addr.val, base + FSPI_IPCR0);
/*
@@ -1365,6 +1365,7 @@ static int nxp_fspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret < 0)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to disable clock");
+ init_completion(&f->c);
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq,
nxp_fspi_irq_handler, 0, pdev->name, f);
if (ret)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 12:47 [PATCH v2 0/3] spi: nxp: Use reinit_completion() for repeated operations Felix Gu
2026-03-04 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] spi: nxp-xspi: " Felix Gu
2026-03-04 14:55 ` Frank Li
2026-03-05 0:13 ` Han Xu
2026-03-04 12:47 ` Felix Gu [this message]
2026-03-05 4:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: nxp-fspi: " Hillf Danton
2026-03-09 2:23 ` Bough Chen
2026-03-04 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] spi: fsl-qspi: " Felix Gu
2026-03-04 14:55 ` Frank Li
2026-03-09 2:23 ` Bough Chen
2026-03-09 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] spi: nxp: " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260304-spi-nxp-v2-2-cd7d7726a27e@gmail.com \
--to=ustc.gu@gmail.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com \
--cc=yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox