public inbox for linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Simplify devm_spi_*_controller()
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:55:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324145548.139952-1-ustc.gu@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <176797260995.67850.318976521283878747.b4-ty@kernel.org>

>  /**
> @@ -3398,22 +3395,14 @@ static void devm_spi_unregister(struct device *dev, void *res)
>  int devm_spi_register_controller(struct device *dev,
>  				 struct spi_controller *ctlr)
>  {
> -	struct spi_controller **ptr;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ptr = devres_alloc(devm_spi_unregister, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!ptr)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
>  	ret = spi_register_controller(ctlr);
> -	if (!ret) {
> -		*ptr = ctlr;
> -		devres_add(dev, ptr);
> -	} else {
> -		devres_free(ptr);
> -	}
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_spi_unregister_controller, ctlr);
>  
> -	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_spi_register_controller);
Hi Andy and Mark,
It seems has a potential corner case in this commit.

The issue is that devm_add_action_or_reset() triggers its callback 
immediately if the internal devres allocation fails. This creates the 
following sequence:
1. spi_register_controller(ctlr) succeeds.
2. devm_add_action_or_reset() is called but fails.
3. The "reset" triggers devm_spi_unregister_controller(ctlr) immediately.
4. This calls spi_unregister_controller(ctlr).
5. For controllers allocated via spi_alloc_host() (where 
   ctlr->devm_allocated is false), spi_unregister_controller() calls 
   put_device(&ctlr->dev).
6. This drops the reference count to zero and frees the ctlr structure.

However, the driver still holds the ctlr pointer and will typically 
attempt its own cleanup, leading to a use-after-free or double-free.

What are your thoughts on this? Does this analysis seem correct, or am
I missing a detail in how the refcounting is handled here?

Best regards,
Felix

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-08 17:51 [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Simplify devm_spi_*_controller() Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-09 15:30 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-24 14:55   ` Felix Gu [this message]
2026-03-25  9:54     ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-25 10:22       ` Felix Gu
2026-03-25 11:36         ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-25 15:03       ` Johan Hovold
2026-03-26  9:29         ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-25 14:59     ` Johan Hovold
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-27 19:51 Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260324145548.139952-1-ustc.gu@gmail.com \
    --to=ustc.gu@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox