From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04A992FF65F; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 16:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776874361; cv=none; b=g/Y6Nh4KYE0Gy79ZsRjniyIf0+YcQ+13pk8OKq25yNF/g2g+DUt5sUtVIR3P4TD/YI5mlbID+rFbfP5BJPBbVsHE227w0epdLu0Glk5gGxP1MuOSqfmk+vu7VPwob9glgt6sgCHdGum3Kyt3BQLiZm6Tset9/5AE9kUhe/i85Ko= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776874361; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I4v1mxCRxuY9peEu8fTfKrXZSA0Vc+jvyVH85GUdMa8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=orAd/1gbQWMHBWVuREwZjvbtQHbFpRKsBFSSGvGTS7HOTTz2xvWQPfEo0gP7PqC1C09NYVjmhqrTqShqBi3zjVK1rj3BoSnXvzY/ogA1h8lNxAmXfuenH0DXwklZYwFVjbiSxwSEkHzxE/zeuU+O/rx78J5LO5L1eyS6ZIFgBxs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZWAvy/nn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZWAvy/nn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04545C19425; Wed, 22 Apr 2026 16:12:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776874360; bh=I4v1mxCRxuY9peEu8fTfKrXZSA0Vc+jvyVH85GUdMa8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZWAvy/nn5QZhZmCrSDiN1EIhuFbaDGGWLi0RwtvoxWRoFd/VfKKhZ0pp9rt/M0wAh ErIoYqjegHXpgg0y+w5dMY7n2dED7Q9TLGX/3RfkFq6U/HIR0yl471rIwfk7ODO7Mo jcKf8e7NQ0dhNeagP758lxGi7ADJxy5AVynoFhtvWvOakj07T6lifdbH9rW/LvRWlN rinzWgRvdEw8uWsJvydj70GUSdw2Hj63LIZJQrzrvUg6Py86sxqueS0oTd/E9q0rLB zMv9wSbNBz8ENafiCZqAI3TwPT+7lDzGhdW0CmZsk92x2XTOZuUvitJzilnWlMZi3m ytReU96Ouh6zw== Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:12:36 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Mark Brown Cc: Conor Dooley , Daire McNamara , Cyril Jean , Valentina.FernandezAlanis@microchip.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] microchip core-qspi gpio-cs fixes + cleanup Message-ID: <20260422-refocus-massive-c3eea64ee60c@spud> References: <20260422-foe-strength-a5d8ad650ef4@spud> <8cb49ccb-5a12-4770-9c91-982d78b5f962@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b3mXLTcArltJS4g8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8cb49ccb-5a12-4770-9c91-982d78b5f962@sirena.org.uk> --b3mXLTcArltJS4g8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 04:25:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 04:15:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: >=20 > > Got a couple of patches here, the first two deal with an issue that a > > customer reported where using a mixed configuration of the built-in chip > > select and a gpio lead to data corruption. Turned out, the built-in chip > > select always gets activated at the moment even if a gpio-cs is being > > used. With that fixed, I noticed that any read with multiple data lines > > was not working properly, so patch two changes how the driver deals with > > emulating mem-ops. The remaining patches are things I consider fixes but > > not meaningful enough to get a Fixes tag. LMK if you want em split out > > to be put on for-next rather than for-current. >=20 > I don't know what for-current is but they certainly don't apply against > for-7.1 which is the only active branch given that v7.0 released (and he > same content as for-linus and for-next as a result). Ah I forgot about that widespread devm_ removal series. > It would be > convenient to split the fixes and cleanups, unless there's actul > dependencies. Sure. I'll rebase, split and resend. There shouldn't be any meaningful dependencies. --b3mXLTcArltJS4g8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaejzdAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0iOnAP4ghNY31x2PcHvukxiOG0UNXW2dN8JYTVfDX4urqheYeQD7B+Cq9/MbM5ku Ft5i3AHUtT1qIWSYcLWZZB/knaUvswA= =z+I5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b3mXLTcArltJS4g8--