linux-spi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] spi/xilinx: Simplify irq allocation
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:00:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E00BF8.2020608@monstr.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130708162642.GM27646@sirena.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2154 bytes --]

On 07/08/2013 06:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:48:14PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 07/08/2013 04:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> Is it definitely safe to leave the IRQ hanging around after the master
>>> has been freed - there's no possibility of a late error interrupt or
>>> something?
> 
>> I think it is more generic question if this race condition is fine
>> for all drivers which are using devres groups.
> 
> Well, it's mainly an issue for IRQs - the other resources don't initiate
> events by themselves which is what causes the issue.  It just needs a
> bit of extra care so I wanted to check that this has been thought of.
> 
>> I have just looked at it and devres_release_all() is called where
>> driver is unload and irq are disabled there.
> 
> The problem is the gap between the resources used to handle the IRQ
> being freed and the IRQ itself being freed - if the hardware can be
> guaranteed to be idle then that's fine but we need to be sure that is
> OK.  Otherwise the interrupt handler may get run and be looking at a
> resource which was freed which would be unfortunate.
> 
>> btw: What's the proper way for spi driver unregistration?
> 
>> spi_unregistered_master() (which also free private structure)
>> and
>> spi_master_put()?
> 
> Yes.

Just a follow up on this.
Which function free private structures registered by spi_alloc_master function?
Is it in spi_master_put()?

The reason why I am asking is where clk_xx functions should be added.
I see them between these two functions in sifr for example.

And also I see in drivers in error probe path that drivers are calling kfree(master)
but they are not doing in remove part (like spi-davinci.c).

I just want to clear this in our zynq drivers before we send them out.

Thanks,
Michal




-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-12 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-08 13:29 [PATCH v1 1/4] spi/xilinx: Remove CONFIG_OF from the driver Michal Simek
2013-07-08 13:29 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] spi/xilinx: Clean ioremap calling Michal Simek
2013-07-08 14:50   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 13:29 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] spi/xilinx: Simplify irq allocation Michal Simek
2013-07-08 14:49   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 15:48     ` Michal Simek
2013-07-08 16:26       ` Mark Brown
2013-07-09 14:15         ` Michal Simek
2013-07-09 14:47           ` Mark Brown
2013-07-09 14:53             ` Michal Simek
2013-07-12 14:00         ` Michal Simek [this message]
2013-08-22 13:10           ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 13:29 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] spi/xilinx: Use of_property_read_u32 for reading value from node Michal Simek
2013-07-08 14:51   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-09  5:26     ` Michal Simek
2013-07-09  9:14       ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 14:49 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] spi/xilinx: Remove CONFIG_OF from the driver Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E00BF8.2020608@monstr.eu \
    --to=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).