From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rhyland Klein Subject: Re: M25P80 Regulator Question Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 14:05:08 -0400 Message-ID: <5273ED54.5030101@nvidia.com> References: <5273E881.8080401@nvidia.com> <20131101180243.GY2493@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131101180243.GY2493-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On 11/1/2013 2:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:44:33PM -0400, Rhyland Klein wrote: > >> Is there some mechanism for defining this dependency? > > Same as any other device, add the regulator to the binding for the flash > chip and add the appropriate code to the chip. > > * Unknown Key > * 0x7EA229BD > Thanks, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything. I'll come up with some patches. I believe there are patches in for optional regulator support right, so I assume that would be the most logical path to take? -rhyland -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html