From: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Axel Lin <axel.lin-8E1dMatC8ynQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: sc18is602: Don't be that restrictive with the maximum transfer speed
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 06:25:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5326F7D1.2050800@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140317115256.GC11706-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
On 03/17/2014 04:52 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 06:47:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Commit 09e99bca8 (spi: sc18is602: Convert to let spi core validate
>> transfer speed) made the maximum transfer speed much more restrictive
>> than before. The transfer speed used to be adjusted to 1/4 of the chip
>> clock rate if a higher transfer speed was requested. Now such transfers are
>> simply rejected. With default settings, this causes, for example, a transfer
>> request at 2 mbps to be rejected because the maximum speed with the default
>> chip clock is 1.843 mbps.
>
>> This is unnecessarily restrictive and causes unnecessary failures. Loosen
>> the limit to accept transfers up to 50% of the clock rate and adjust
>> the speed as needed when setting up the actualt transfer.
>
> Given this description I'd expect to see a change in the core not a
> driver - like the other fork of the thread said I'd expect to deal with
> the issue by improving the constraint handling code.
>
Agreed.
>> master->transfer_one_message = sc18is602_transfer_one;
>> master->dev.of_node = np;
>> master->min_speed_hz = hw->freq / 128;
>> - master->max_speed_hz = hw->freq / 4;
>> + master->max_speed_hz = hw->freq / 2;
>
> That said, if this is something that the hardware can support it makes
> sense to do it anyway - is there an actual spec constraint available?
>
No, the technical fastest transfer speed is hz / 4, so this would be just an
arbitrary limit to be less restrictive. Axel's patch for the spi core works
perfectly, so I would suggest to go with it if that is acceptable for you.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-17 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-17 1:47 [PATCH] spi: sc18is602: Don't be that restrictive with the maximum transfer speed Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <1395020870-18107-1-git-send-email-linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-17 2:07 ` Axel Lin
[not found] ` <CAFRkauDEBe+XStLJSiMzvNOxpFZ2iBGD36-Brq9oHN2RRa+rog-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-17 3:53 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <532671A5.5070302-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-17 11:27 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-17 11:52 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20140317115256.GC11706-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-17 13:25 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5326F7D1.2050800@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux-0h96xk9xttrk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axel.lin-8E1dMatC8ynQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).