From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyrille Pitchen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:39:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5694BBCD.8020700@atmel.com> References: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: Mans Rullgard , , "Yang, Wenyou" , Nicolas Ferre , Mark Brown , , Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Hi Mans, I've tried to apply your patch on a next-20160112 branch to test it but= it failed. I've also looked at the for-next branch of the SPI sub-system g= it tree. It seems that one issue occurred within a chunk patching the atmel_spi_= setup() function. Please see below. Le 11/01/2016 17:01, Mans Rullgard a =E9crit : [...] > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c > index 08cbb3e43c76..d4a806e24060 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c [...] > @@ -1603,6 +1611,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *s= pi) > } > =20 > asd->npcs_pin =3D npcs_pin; > + asd->use_cs_gpio =3D use_cs_gpio; > spi->controller_state =3D asd; > } else { > atmel_spi_lock(as); [...] There is no 'else' statement in the source code I'm looking at. Best regards, Cyrille -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html