[PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64

[PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64

[Michal Simek]

This driver is used on new Xilinx ZynqMP SoC.

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
---

 drivers/spi/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/Kconfig b/drivers/spi/Kconfig
index ab8dfbef6f1b..fec97a479433 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/spi/Kconfig
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ config SPI_BUTTERFLY
 
 config SPI_CADENCE
 	tristate "Cadence SPI controller"
-	depends on ARM
+	depends on ARM || ARM64
 	help
 	  This selects the Cadence SPI controller master driver
 	  used by Xilinx Zynq.
-- 
1.8.2.3

Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 165 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:44:01AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> This driver is used on new Xilinx ZynqMP SoC.

Why does this have an architecture dependence at all?

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64

[Michal Simek]

On 02/24/2015 09:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:44:01AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> This driver is used on new Xilinx ZynqMP SoC.
> 
> Why does this have an architecture dependence at all?

Let me push this to my repo and run Fenguang's system on it if there
is any build error on others architectures.
I expect that this could be sufficient test, right?

Thanks,
Michal

Re: [PATCH] spi: Enable Cadence SPI driver for ARM64

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 470 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:23:29AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 09:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:44:01AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> This driver is used on new Xilinx ZynqMP SoC.

> > Why does this have an architecture dependence at all?

> Let me push this to my repo and run Fenguang's system on it if there
> is any build error on others architectures.
> I expect that this could be sufficient test, right?

Probably, yes.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]