From: Stefan Agner <stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexander Stein
<alexander.stein-93q1YBGzJSMe9JSWTWOYM3xStJ4P+DSV@public.gmane.org>
Cc: bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:38:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864d33fc96f58cf0801b773ba75845e2@agner.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <120830674.SMntmZQuCR@ws-stein>
On 2015-12-10 01:06, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Thursday 10 December 2015 14:14:11, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
>> On 12/10/2015 12:45 PM, Alexander Stein wrote:
>> > On Thursday 10 December 2015 11:25:30, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
>> >> DSPI instances in Vybrid have a different amount of chip selects
>> >> and CTARs (Clock and transfer Attributes Register). In case of
>> >> DSPI1 we only have 2 CTAR registers and 4 CS. In present driver
>> >> implementation CTAR offset is derived from CS instance which will
>> >> lead to out of bound access if chip select instance is greater than
>> >> CTAR register instance, hence use single CTAR0 register for all CS
>> >> instances. Since we write the CTAR register anyway before each access,
>> >> there is no value in using the additional CTAR registers. Also one
>> >> should not program a value in CTAS for a CTAR register that is not
>> >> present, hence configure CTAS to use CTAR0.
>> >
>> > Shouldn't the information put into struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data how much CTAR and CS the actual implementation has available? E.g. LS1021A has 6 CS and 4 CTAR
>>
>> I guess still this will not help us when CS instance greater than CTAR
>> instance is selected. Other point to consider here is we are writing the
>> CTAR register before every access, so for us there is no additional
>> advantage of using multiple CTAR registers.
>
> Please have a look at 5cc7b04740effa5cc0af53f434134b5859d58b73 which
> addresses this problem for the 4 CTAR and 6 CS case.
> I'm unsure how multiple CTAR will help at all. But at the end the
> amount of CS seems to be different for different implementations. So
> this still needs to be added to fsl_dspi_devtype_data.
IMO the multiple CTAR registers are only really helpful for
bare-metal/microcontroller kind of application where you want to safe
every register write. The Kernel anyway writes the register before each
transfer, so there is no value making use of the multiple registers...
By just using the first CTAR, it is not required to have the amount of
CS around, the SPI frameowork takes care of assigning the CS, and that
is all what is needed...
--
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-10 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-10 5:55 [PATCH v2] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access Bhuvanchandra DV
2015-12-10 7:15 ` Alexander Stein
2015-12-10 8:44 ` Bhuvanchandra DV
[not found] ` <56693B5B.6060100-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-10 9:06 ` Alexander Stein
2015-12-10 16:38 ` Stefan Agner [this message]
2015-12-10 16:47 ` Stefan Agner
[not found] ` <1449726930-7378-1-git-send-email-bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-12 23:08 ` Applied "spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access" to the spi tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=864d33fc96f58cf0801b773ba75845e2@agner.ch \
--to=stefan-xlvq0vzyd2y@public.gmane.org \
--cc=alexander.stein-93q1YBGzJSMe9JSWTWOYM3xStJ4P+DSV@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bhuvanchandra.dv-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).