From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Jarzmik Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: pxa: ssp: Fix build error by removing originally incorrect DT binding Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:06:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87bncvr6jc.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <1441610581-11434-1-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> <87zj0rsqhe.fsf@belgarion.home> <55FFB643.1080208@linux.intel.com> <87fv28qh49.fsf@belgarion.home> <20150921151503.GK2381@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jarkko Nikula , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Mark Brown , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , stable@vger.kernel.org To: Vinod Koul Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150921151503.GK2381@localhost> (Vinod Koul's message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:45:03 +0530") Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Vinod Koul writes: >> Now knowing if it is v4.3-rc3 is another story, as currently the pxa platform is >> broken because of a dmaengine regression. And if the necessary fix is not >> applied through dmaengine tree (by lack of time from Vinod), I'll want to carry >> it through my tree, which is the reason why I have not made the pull request >> yet. > > Which ones are required for fixing, I will priortize those... Hi Vinod, My favorite (which fixes it fully) is : - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/6/112 (ie. only 1/3) As a fallback plan, if the above patch is too risky for a -rc serie, my fallback plan is : - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/128 PXA can sustain only the fallback for v4.3, but the favorite has to be in v4.4, with its 2 other brothers, in a form or another. Fallback plan is compatible with the favorite, ie. fallback should not be reverted after favorite is applied. Cheers. -- Robert